'Bowler is not the villain here' - MCC re-asserts its stance on running out non-striker for backing up
Although MCC dubbed running a non-striker out for backing up into its fair-play category, critics and fans remain divided. Meanwhile, MCC has re-asserted its stance, affirming that the bowler "is not the villain" in this scenario.
FollowNo bowler can be dubbed a villain for running out a batter, attempting to steal ground at the non-striker's end, the World Cricket Committee of the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) asserted as it sought normalisation of the dismissal at all age-group levels. The WCC also called for "calm" on the contentious issue as a few former cricketers still believe that the dismissal mode is against the game's spirit despite the International Cricket Council (ICC) ruling that it will be counted as 'run out' rather than 'unfair play'.
Last month, the MCC, the custodians of the game's laws, clarified the law's wording following an incident in which Australian leg-spinner Adam Zampa attempted to run out non-striker Tom Rogers in a Big Bash League (BBL) game in January. The clarification involved changing the wording of Law 38.3 to deliver better clarity and dispel "misconceptions" about it.
The WCC, which met at the ICC headquarters in Dubai last week, is now calling for calm across all levels of the game -- from recreational cricket to the elite group -- given that the act of running out a non-striker who opts to steal ground is within the laws of the game.
"The overriding factor is that there is a simple way that all confusion and controversy around this form of dismissal can be eradicated - by non-strikers complying with the Law and remaining within their ground until they have seen the ball being released from the bowler's hand," the MCC said in a statement on Thursday.
ALSO READ:Â 'I'm playing till 2024' - David Warner vows to continue playing limited-overs if snubbed of Test spot
"Part of the discussion in Dubai touched on the growing narrative for the bowler to be vilified for this type of dismissal. The committee members were unanimous in their view that the batter stealing ground is breaking the game's laws and therefore deserving of recrimination. They also agreed that there is no precedent to require a bowler to warn a batter, confirming they are completely within their right to dismiss the batter on the first time they break the Law," it added.
The WCC comprises greats of the game, including Kumar Sangakkara, Sourav Ganguly, Justin Langer, and Alastair Cook, with Mike Gatting being the chairman. "The bowler is not the villain here. Every batter has a choice; to stay in their ground or risk being given out if they try to steal ground. If they choose the latter, they are the ones who are breaking the Law," said Sri Lankan great Sangakkara.
ALSO READ:Â IND vs AUS 2022-23 - Australia brings back Glenn Maxwell, Mitchell Marsh and Jhye Richardson for ODIs
Gatting added: "We have seen suggestions that this method of dismissal will be attempted more and more at the recreational level, and there is the possibility of matches descending into chaos. While it may increase in the short term, we expect batters to quickly learn their responsibilities under the Laws and drive them out of prominence. Although the wording of the Law has recently been clarified, the timing of when the run-out can be attempted has been unchanged since 2017, so very little has changed."
"Our stance on this is simple batters must not steal ground if they do not wish to be given out in this manner. Nor should they be expecting to be given a warning if they do. If all non-strikers only left the popping crease once the ball had been released, there would never be the need for such a dismissal again," said the former England batter.
(With inputs from PTI)
