ISRO spy case: Supreme Court sets aside Kerala HC order on pre-arrest bail for 5
In 2020, the Kerala government had also handed over an additional compensation of Rs 1.30 crore to the former scientist in the case, which has also been at the centre of several political standoffs.
FollowThe Supreme Court on Friday (December 1) set aside the Kerala High Court order on pre-arrest bail for five accused, including a former top cop in the ISRO spy case. The 1994 espionage case involves the alleged framing of former Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) scientist Nambi Narayanan.
The top court has asked the Kerala high court to decide their bail plea afresh within four weeks. It has also been noted that the accused will not be arrested in the interim period for five weeks.
Also read:Â JNU campus walls defaced with anti-brahmin slogans, probe ordered
In 1994, scientist Nambi Narayanan was wrongly accused of selling crucial secrets associated with the country's space technology to Pakistan.
In 1998, he was later acquitted by a CBI court and the Supreme Court. He had spent a total of 50 days in jail along with fellow scientist D Sasikumar and four others.
In 2018, he was compensated Rs. 50 lakh by the Supreme Court for "unnecessary arrest, harassment and mental cruelty".
Also read:Â Ludhiana court blast: NIA arrests key conspirator Harpreet Singh from Delhi airport
In 2020, the Kerala government had also handed over an additional compensation of Rs 1.30 crore to the former scientist in the case, which has also been at the centre of several political standoffs.
In June 2020, the CBI had booked former Intelligence Bureau (IB) deputy director RB Sreekumar and 16 other police personnel over the alleged conspiracy. Former Kerala Police officer S Vijayan had filed a plea last year in the Kerala HC in the case.
Also read:Â PM Modi's convoy stops to make way for ambulance in Ahmedabad roadshow; Watch
In July 2021, the former police officer alleged that Narayanan had influenced the CBI probe by entering into land deals worth crores with the then investigating officials of the agency. Months later, in November, the high court had dismissed the petition.
