Australia’s under-16 social media ban sparks debate on teen wellbeing, cyberbullying, and tech addiction. Experts weigh in on potential risks and benefits as the world watches this pioneering legislation.
Australia's under-16 social media ban will make the nation a real-life laboratory to better understand the technology's impact on young people, experts say. Those in favour of Wednesday's world-first ban point to a growing mass of studies that suggest too much time online takes a toll on teen wellbeing. But opponents argue there is not enough hard proof to warrant the new legislation, which could do more harm than good by isolating vulnerable children.
Adolescent brains are still developing into the early 20s, said psychologist Amy Orben, who leads a digital mental health programme at the University of Cambridge.
And a "huge amount" of observational research, often based on surveys, has tracked a correlation between teen tech use and worse mental health, she told AFP.
Related Articles
But it is hard to draw firm conclusions, because phones are so ingrained into daily life, and young people may turn to social media because they are already suffering.
"With technology, because it's changing so fast, the evidence base will always be uncertain," Orben said.
"Evaluating the Australia ban is hugely important because it actually gives us a window on what might be happening."
No ‘smoking gun’
Australian researchers are recruiting 13- to 16-year-olds for a "Connected Minds Study" to assess how the ban affects their wellbeing.
A World Health Organization survey last year found that 11 percent of adolescents struggled to control their social media use.
Other research has shown a link between excessive social media use and poor sleep, body image, school performance and emotional distress.
For example, one 2019 study of US schoolchildren, published in JAMA Psychiatry, found that those who spent over three hours a day on social media could be at heightened risk for mental health problems.
Some experts argue now is the right time to act.
"I actually don't think this is a science issue. This is a values issue," said Christian Heim, an Australian psychiatrist and clinical director of mental health.
"We're talking about things like cyberbullying, the risk of suicide, accessing sites on anorexia nervosa and self-harm," he told AFP.
Evidence of a risk is growing, he said, pointing to a 2018 study by neuroscientist Christian Montag that linked addiction to the Chinese messaging app WeChat to shrinking grey matter volume in part of the brain.
"We can't wait for stronger evidence," Heim said.
Scott Griffiths of the Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences said a "smoking gun research study" was unlikely to emerge soon to prove the harms of social media.
But the ban was worth trying, he said.
"I'm hopeful that the major social media companies seeing this full-throated legislative action come into play will finally be motivated to more meaningfully protect the health and wellbeing of young people."
‘Too blunt’
More than three-quarters of Australian adults agreed with the new legislation before it passed, a poll indicated.
However, an open letter signed by more than 140 academics, campaigners and other experts cautioned that a ban would be "too blunt an instrument".
"People were saying: 'Well, kids are getting more anxious. There must be a reason -- let's ban social media,'" argued one signatory, Axel Bruns, a digital media professor at Queensland University of Technology.
Children may simply have more reasons to be anxious, under pressure from pandemic-interrupted schooling and troubled by wars in Gaza and Ukraine, he told AFP.
And a ban might push some teens to more extreme, fringe sites, while preventing other marginalised young people from finding community.
Noelle Martin, an activist focused on image-based online abuse and deepfakes, feared the Australian ban would do little to help, given the country's history on enforcement of existing laws.
"I don't believe it will stop, prevent or do much to meaningfully combat this issue," Martin said.
In any case, the political decision has been taken.
"With one law, we can protect Generation Alpha from being sucked into purgatory by the predatory algorithms," Communications Minister Anika Wells said in the days before the ban.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by Asianet Newsable English staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
