Karti Chidambaram tampered with evidence during visits abroad: CBI to Supreme Court
- The agency told a bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra that there was a need to issue a lookout circular (LoC) against Karti as he had the "potential" to tamper with the evidence and he had done this during his visits abroad.
- The court posted the matter for further hearing on October 9.
- On September 1, the CBI had told the top court that there were "good, cogent" reasons for issuing the LoC against Karti.
FollowKarti Chidambaram, son of former Union Minister P Chidambaram, had "tampered" with evidence relating to an alleged graft case against him during his visits abroad in the months of May, June and July this year, the CBI alleged in the Supreme Court today.
The agency told a bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra that there was a need to issue a lookout circular (LoC) against Karti as he had the "potential" to tamper with the evidence and he had done this during his visits abroad.
The CBI FIR, lodged on May 15, had alleged irregularities in Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) clearance to INX Media for receiving overseas funds to the tune of Rs 305 crore in 2007 when Karti's father was the Union Finance Minister.Â
crore attached.
"The LoC has two purposes. First, considering the investigation, he (Karti) may not become an outlaw and second, he can tamper with the evidence outside India," Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for CBI, told the bench.
"I will show he (Karti) has the potential to tamper with the evidence. During May 13 to May 18 and second week of June to second week of July, he went abroad and he did tamper with the evidence. I will justify this," Mehta told the bench, also comprising Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud.
He said there were "contemporaneous official records" which reflected this.
"These are not statements under section 161 of CrPC which can be obtained by pressurising somebody.
These are contemporaneous official records," Mehta told the court. He also sought to place before the bench some documents in a sealed cover, which was objected to by senior advocate Kapil Sibal, who was representing Karti.
Sibal also questioned the way in which CBI was seeking to place on record certain documents in a sealed cover, after Mehta referred to legal provisions and said these empowered the probe agency to share case diary with the court without sharing them with the accused.
Meanwhile, Mehta told the apex court that he would seek instructions on whether the division bench of the Madras High Court be asked to decide the main matter pending there.
The court posted the matter for further hearing on October 9.
CBI had last month told the apex court that Karti was prevented from travelling abroad as he was allegedly closing several of his foreign bank accounts. The CBI's contention was strongly refuted by Karti's counsel.
The top court is hearing CBI's appeal challenging Madras High Court order staying the government's LOC against Karti in the alleged graft case.
On September 1, the CBI had told the top court that there were "good, cogent" reasons for issuing the LoC against Karti.
