An Ayodhya court extended the judicial custody of eight accused in the Ram Mandir donation embezzlement case. The Supreme Court has also issued notice for an independent probe and sought a status report from the SIT constituted by the UP government.
Ayodhya Court Extends Custody of Accused
An Ayodhya court on Monday extended the judicial custody of all eight accused in the Ram Mandir donation embezzlement case by another 14 days. The accused appeared before the court through video conferencing. They are now scheduled to appear again on July 27.
Earlier, investigating Officer Ashutosh Tiwari submitted to Ayodhya's Anti-Corruption Court evidence and documents collected during the remand period for three accused in connection with the case, according to sources.
Supreme Court Seeks Independent Probe
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Centre, the Uttar Pradesh government and the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust seeking response on pleas seeking an independent, court-monitored probe into the alleged misappropriation of donations at the Ram Janmabhoomi temple in Ayodhya.
A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohan also directed the Special Investigation Team (SIT) constituted by the Uttar Pradesh government to place a status report before it.
The Court has sought details on the composition of the SIT. "We direct the SIT constituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh to submit a status report. Post this matter for further consideration next Monday. Please also mention the composition of the SIT in the status report," the Court said.
Courtroom Exchange
During the hearing, Solicitor General of India (SGI) Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Uttar Pradesh government, urged the Court not to issue notice, submitting that the State had already constituted an SIT and that the investigation was underway. "A notice may not be necessary", the SGI said.
The Court, however, clarified that it was not examining the merits of the allegations at this stage and only wanted to be apprised of the progress of the investigation.
The Court, however, did not entertain arguments by the petitioner's counsel that more than seventeen days have passed since the constitution of the SIT and no progress has been made. The Court responded to the submission by suggesting the counsels save their energy as it would be required once they go and give sound bites to the media, outside the court.
"Save your energy because you are required to use it outside also. You don't want us to pass an order?" the Court said.
The Court thereafter proceeded to issue notice and called for the SIT's status report along with details of its composition.
The petitions seek an independent probe into allegations that donations made by devotees at the Ram Mandir were siphoned off by staff handling the counting of cash offerings.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by Asianetnews Editorial staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)