The National Commission for Scheduled Castes has asked the Himachal Pradesh govt and DGP for an Action Taken Report on a complaint by DSP Vijay Kumar, who alleged caste-based harassment, victimisation, and misuse of authority by senior officers.
The National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has asked the Himachal Pradesh government and the state Director General of Police to submit an Action Taken Report (ATR) on its recommendations in a complaint alleging deliberate caste-based atrocities against DSP Vijay Kumar.
In a minutes-forwarding letter dated October 9, the Commission forwarded the proceedings of its September 10 hearing to Additional Chief Secretary (Home and Vigilance) R D Nazeem and the Director General of Police, Himachal Pradesh Police. The letter seeks an ATR on the Commission’s recommendations within the stipulated period in the case registered.
Allegations of Harassment and Discrimination
The complaint was filed by Vijay Kumar, Deputy Superintendent of Police (Headquarters), Shimla, who has alleged caste-based harassment, institutional victimisation, professional isolation and misuse of administrative authority by senior police officials. Kumar has alleged that a November 5, 2025 transfer order posting him as Sub-Divisional Police Officer at Paonta Sahib was deliberately obstructed by senior officers to favour another official.
Following proceedings before the Himachal Pradesh High Court, Kumar was subsequently moved to the 2nd India Reserve Battalion at Sakoh in Kangra district. He has alleged that the sequence of postings, joining-related difficulties and subsequent deployment reflected discriminatory treatment.
The police department has denied caste bias and maintained that the transfers and movement orders were routine administrative decisions. It has described the dispute as arising from administrative dissatisfaction.
The DSP has also alleged that his official vehicle was withdrawn, his substantive duties were curtailed, and subordinate personnel were discouraged from working with him. He has claimed that these actions resulted in professional isolation and eroded his ability to discharge normal official responsibilities.
Kumar further stated that he suffered serious spinal injuries and was on medical leave from March 12 to May 10 this year. Despite this, he alleged that he was assigned physically demanding field duties inconsistent with medical advice. The department questioned the claim of incapacity, citing Kumar’s travel to New Delhi for Commission proceedings.
NCSC Seeks Records and Issues Directives
During the September 10 hearing, however, the NCSC reportedly rejected the contention that travel to attend a constitutional body’s hearing could be treated as evidence of fitness for strenuous field assignments. At the hearing, attended by Additional Chief Secretary R D Nazeem, the NCSC panel headed by Member Partha Biswas took exception to the continued absence of the state DGP and sought comprehensive records from the police department.
The Commission has required the state to provide chronological records concerning Kumar’s transfer, joining and deployment, as well as comparative details of other HPPS officers transferred in the same period. It has also sought the policy and justification concerning vehicle allocation and the duties assigned to Kumar during his recovery period.
The NCSC has directed that Kumar be protected against coercive, retaliatory or adverse action for pursuing his complaint before the constitutional body. It has also required that his work assignment be compatible with his medical condition and that the DGP appear personally at the next hearing.
The matter remains under examination by the Commission. The NCSC communication establishes that the state government and the police chief have been formally asked to report action taken on its recommendations; it does not amount to a final finding on the allegations.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by Asianetnews Editorial staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)