Asianet NewsableAsianet Newsable

Inside story: Why 'ache din' will remain a distant dream

  • Right from Jawaharlal Nehru every prime minister has dashed peoples' expectations.
  • Indira Gandhi  was hard put to distance herself from the election-winning promise of 'garibi hatao'
  • Nitin Gadkari now admits that the promise of `acchhe din` has become a millstone around the government’s neck
no punches pulled virendra kapoor column

Within months of winning a huge mandate, Indira Gandhi  was hard put to distance herself from the election-winning promise of 'garibi hatao'. A few weeks after demolishing the Syndicate in the 1971 poll, she ticked off agitating people in Ghaziabad, saying she did not possess a `magic wand’ to remove poverty. Well over four decades later, garibi is still with us. That says something about the enormous task of removing endemic poverty and hunger — and the insurmountable hazards successive politicians face in meeting peoples’ expectations. There has always been a huge gap between electoral promise and actual delivery everywhere in the democratic world.

From Jawaharlal Nehru disappointing two generations of Indians who were led to believe that Swaraj would transform their bleak and dreary lives to his daughter, every prime minister has dashed peoples’ expectations. Yes, there were some who evoked no hope since they were mere care-takers or time-pass. Men like Charan Singh and Chandra Shekhar.  But others, like Rajiv Gandhi  — marketed as  the new hope of the nation by  PR managers  —too  let down the country. 

Therefore, if Nitin Gadkari, the well-regarded Minister for Road Transport and Highways, is candid enough to admit that the promise of `acchhe din` has become a millstone around the government’s neck, it ought to be welcome. Like every politician on the stump, Modi and Co. too oversold the dream. Acchhe din and the promise of Rs. 15 lakhs in every Indian’s account were two such irredeemable slogans. Though, for the record, it was Manmohan Singh who had first talked of `acchhe din,’ but being Manmohan Singh they never took notice of what he said or did. 

But it would be a mistake to believe that Modi would not have won without those promises. The popular mood was such that any credible leader with strong organizational support would have decimated the UPA, widely perceived to be corrupt and non-functional.  The promise of `achhe din’ and Rs. 15 lakhs  only  bolstered further  the NDA cause but did  in no  way alter the voting preference of Indians who were already determined to throw  out the UPA.         

Yet, despite Gadkari’s lament the discerning cannot fail to observe the all-round incremental improvement in governance. In fact, Modi has single-handedly engaged himself in fixing what can be called the plumbing of the ` system’. To begin with, he has ensured that no one in the political executive is on the take — something that could not be said of any cabinet in free India, including Nehru’s.

Gadkari himself is doing an excellent job of speeding up the construction of highways, reviving abandoned projects, commissioning  new ones and generally creating an impression of a doer rather than  a talker, though his colloquial speech peppered  with street-level Mumbaia phrases such as  `is ko to maaroo ga’ or `khali pili bum marta hai’ might appear less than  ministerial.   

To return to the election-time over-promise, well, there is not one party anywhere in the democratic world which is not guilty of the charge. ~New Deal ;  Yes, We can;   Change You Can Believe In  ,~ etc., are some of the winning tag lines of famous presidential campaigns in the recent US history. Well, Obama, the self-proclaimed harbinger of Change with a capital C, is set to go down as one of the bigger disappointments.

And witness how that unreconstructed demagogue Donald Trump is demolishing  conventional politics, appealing to the lowest common denominator and threatening to make the most open society in the world inward looking and insular, economically, politically and socially.                    

Nearer home, we have Arvind Kejriwal. The man now duly certified to be in possession of an extra long tongue for a rather small face, and using it only for abusing all and sundry. He is now engaged fulltime in making a hash of things in the national capital. His government goes missing when needed the most —like at present when Delhi is in the throes of an epidemic of chikungunya and dengue. And when it does surface it only spews venom against constitutional authorities.  Did the man with the long tongue not promise the moon to the voters? He did.

Meanwhile, playing the devil’s advocate let us argue that no government can fully meet the voters’ aspirations, especially in a country like India where poverty, hunger, ignorance, illiteracy, etc. are deep-rooted. Modi or any other well-meaning politician can only try but unless the permanent bureaucracy, the police and everyone else on the public payroll sheds the corrupt and slothful ways change will be hard to come. In short, the fault lies with   our national character.  You can change a leader, but can you change the entire people? Ultimately, we all are to blame for the poor state we are in.  It is because in some way we are all corrupt.    

Apply, apply, no sunwai in PMO

Sometime ago it seems a BJP leader from Bihar, who had  lost  the last Lok Sabha poll, complained to Gadkari that despite repeated attempts  he was unable to get an appointment with Modi.  Gadkari told him not to lose hope. ` Arrey, he gave `appointment’ to his own mother  two years after becoming PM.  You should have patience.’  It may be recalled that Modi’s mother  visited him in Delhi for the first time in May this year, though he had become PM in May 2014.      

A faux socialist living life first-class

Congress General Secretary Digvijay Singh had devised an easy way to convert economy class airline tickets into first class: He would send them across to a Delhi-based wheeler-dealer Deepak Talwar. Recent ED raids on Talwar’s establishments, who had first emerged as the capital’s go-to fixer due to his proximity to the late A. N. Verma, Principal Secretary to Prime Minister Narasimha Rao, revealed the secular, socialist neta’s fondness for luxurious travel  — but at other peoples’ expense. Singh got so many cattle-class tickets converted  into first class that the difference in cost works out to be over Rs one crore, chicken-feed for the fixer who could make  many times over in return by swinging  just one  deal courtesy Singh.      

A first class ticket usually costs eight to ten times the price  of an economy class ticket. Singh’s excuse that he believed that Talwar got them `upgraded’ through his contacts is hard to swallow.  Again, even if he and his family members had to make multiple trips to the US due to the illness of his wife, who has since expired,  — and Singh has since contracted another marriage —why couldn’t the self-proclaimed socialist fly economy  like the rest of the janata.

Or is it that secular-socialists are more likely to fall for creature comforts than the hard-working rightists who know the value of every  penny because it is earned with the sweat of one’s brow and is not a hand-out from some crony capitalist friend.  Besides, whatever happened to the hundreds of crores of rupees, which, as the late Arjun Singh used to allege, Singh had reportedly made during his ten-year stint as Madhya Pradesh chief minister.     

Of  lambi and gandi juban 

The news that the chronic cough of Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal was due to an unusually long tongue for a small mouth, which had since been snipped adequately in a Bengaluru hospital, has caused much comment, particularly in the Delhi units of the BJP and the Congress.  In fact, a Delhi BJP leader felt vindicated: “I had always  maintained that Kejriwal’s tongue was not only ~lambi’ but ~gandi~ as well.”  His Congress counterpart was less harsh though, hoping that following the surgical procedure on his tongue he would exercise due restraint in speech. Some hope that, really?  

Follow Us:
Download App:
  • android
  • ios