Uniform Civil Code a 'war' against Muslims: Muslim Law Board
- The Civil Code will, like donkeys, make us all the same colour, the Board proclaimed.
- The Board stated that Hindus had a higher ratio of divorces in India.
- The Board categorically stated it did not want triple talaq banned.
FollowThe All Indian Muslim Personal Law Board and various other outfits have formally opposed the Law Commission's questionnaire on the Uniform Civil Code. On Thursday they announced their boycott of the move, accusing the government of waging a "war" against the community.
Addressing a press conference here, they contended that Uniform Civil Code (UCC), if implemented, will paint all people in "one colour like donkeys" which will threaten the country's pluralism and diversity. It was stated in the conference that India needs to be multi-coloured and not 'one coloured like donkeys'.
Trashing the government's stand on the issue of triple talaq, the outfits instead claimed the community had reported lesser number of divorces when compared to Hindus, who, they said, reported a higher divorce ratio according to Census 2011.
AIMPLB general secretary Wali Rehmani, Jamiat-Ulema-e-Hind president Maulana Arshad Madani and representatives of other bodies said all the Muslim sects and its women were "one" on these issues.
They said the outfits will launch a campaign to create awareness amongst Muslims from today, beginning with a gathering in Lucknow.
The Board said that there are "flaws" in the personal laws governing Muslims and they are being addressed from time-to-time.
They said the country is facing problems on various fronts including the LoC and issues like killings elsewhere. "This is all destructive. The government should try to fix this and ensure peace than seeking views on issues like UCC," Madani said.
Contrary to the Commission's claim that the step is an "endeavour" to address discrimination against vulnerable groups and harmonise the various cultural practices, Rehmani said when implemented the UCC will bring to an end country's pluralism and paint all in "one colour" and end diversity and pluralism.
"People of different cultures stay in this country. If the UCC is implemented, attempts will be made to paint all in one colour, which is not in the interest of the country.”
"Also, we don't want the practice of triple talaq to be abolished. There are more divorces in other communities. Rather the highest rate, which is double that of Muslims, is among Hindus," he claimed.
When pointed that some Muslim community members have raised the issue of triple talaq, Rehmani curtly said that "they have all the right to do so in a democracy".
Madani termed as a "trap" the Commission's claim that the move is an attempt to address discrimination. "The government is trying to divert attention of people from its failure. We hope it withdraws the move. If it doesn't, we will decide on our future course of action. At present, we are trying to create awareness among Muslims in the country," he added.
Meanwhile, women members of the Board stressed that contrary to perception, the personal law balances rights of Muslim women and men "very well" and that there is no need for reforms in it.
"There is no need for any reform in the law. Triple talaq is not an issue and the government's move to impose UCC intends to snatch our religious freedom guaranteed in the Indian Constitution. That's the reason we are fighting for our rights," Aasma Zehra, a Board member, said.
Making perhaps the first such move, the Law Commission had on October 7 sought feedback from public on whether the practice of triple talaq be abolished and whether a uniform civil code should be optional.
