Landmark Verdict: SC Grants ‘Right to Die’ to Ghaziabad Man After 13 Years in Coma

The Supreme Court, in a first, allowed passive euthanasia for a 31-year-old man in a vegetative state since 2013. The court reaffirmed the right to die with dignity, allowing the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for Harish Rana.

SC Upholds Right to Die with Dignity

In a landmark judgement reaffirming a patient's right to die with dignity, the Supreme Court on Wednesday, for the first time ever, allowed for a 31-year-old man who has been in a vegetative state to undergo passive euthanasia in order to ensure that the best interest of the patient and to give him the right to die with dignity.

A bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and KV Vishwanathan reasoned that the as per various medical reports, further administration of CAN (Clinically Assisted Nutrition) will not be in the best interest of the patient. The applicant, Harish Rana has been in a vegetative state since the last thirteen years after an accidental fall from a building in 2013.

Defining Passive Euthanasia

Passive euthanasia is the practice of withdrawing life-sustaining treatment to patients in persistent vegetative state, in order to allow them a natural death.

Directives for Palliative Care

The Court has also directed All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) to provide facilities to shift the patient to it's palliative care department to carry out a robust withdrawal of medical care in a manner that ensures that the patients' dignity is preserved to the highest degree.

Judicial Commentary

"The famous literary Shakespeare quote 'To be or not to be' is now being used for judicially interpreting the 'Right to Die'", Justice Pardiwala noted at the beginning of the judgement.

The Court also expressed its appreciation for the parents of the patient for their resilient care for their son. "You are not giving up in your son. You are allowing him to live with dignity", Justice Pardiwala said while concluding the judgement.

Application of Legal Precedents and Guidelines

The top court has applied the guidelines passed in it's earlier ruling in the Common Cause case. "However, the present case represents the first instance where the guidelines laid down in Common Cause v. Union of India are being applied in their full measure before this Court," the bench said.

In November 2025, the top court had set up a medical board at the Noida district hospital to explore the idea of passive euthanasia for the person. In October 2024, the Union Health ministry had released the draft of "Guidelines for Withdrawal of Life Support in Terminally ill Patients".

Conditions for Withdrawal of Life Support

The guidelines issued states that it should be based on "considered decision" taken by doctors on withdrawal of life support in terminally ill patients based on certain conditions. According to the draft guidelines the withdrawal includes four conditions, a) any individual declared brainstem death as per THOA Act. b) Medical prognostication and considered opinion that patient's disease condition is advanced and not likely to benefit from aggressive therapeutic interventions c) Patient/surrogate documented informed refusal, following prognostic awareness, to continue life support d) Compliance with procedure prescribed by the Supreme Court. (ANI)

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by Asianet Newsable English staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)