The Supreme Court deemed the information on electoral bonds "sufficiently available" with the SBI.
Image credits: Getty
2. Contempt warning and notice:
A five-judge bench, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, warned the SBI of potential contempt proceedings.
Image credits: Getty
3. Court's criticism during hearing:
During the hearing, the Supreme Court criticized the SBI for its non-disclosure of progress in providing details of electoral bonds.
Image credits: Getty
4. Crystal clear judgment:
Asserted that the court's February 15 judgment was "crystal clear" in instructing the SBI to open the sealed cover, collate details, and share information with the EC.
Image credits: Getty
5. Mandate under Electoral Bonds scheme:
Pointed out that the scrapped electoral bonds scheme mandated the details by the buyer when requested or in case of an offense registration by a law enforcement agency.