Karnataka government order bans hijab in minority institutions
Further intensifying its stance, the Karnataka government has issued an order, which bans the wearing of the hijab and other religious symbols in minority institutions operating under the state government.
Further intensifying its stance, the Karnataka government has issued an order, which bans the wearing of the hijab and other religious symbols in minority institutions operating under the state government.
The circular, issued by Minority Welfare Department, states that government-run residential schools and Moulana Azad Model Schools (English medium) come under the interim order of the full bench of the Karnataka High Court.
Also Read: Karnataka HM warns: 'Today it is about hijab, tomorrow they may seek syllabus change'
All Minority Welfare Department-run educational institutions have been directed not to allow saffron shawls, hijab, scarves, and other religious symbols into the classrooms.
The order cited the high court order which had requested the state government and all their stakeholders to reopen educational institutions and allow students to return to the classes at the earliest.
However, the court ruled that pending consideration of all the petitions with regard to the hijab case, all students -- regardless of their religion or faith -- are restrained from wearing saffron shawls, scarfs, hijab, and religious symbols within the classroom until further orders.
Also Read: Pro-hijab arguments in court based on illogical jurisprudence
The government said that the circular was issued after multiple reports emerged of girl students attending classes wearing the hijab. Students wearing hijab have already started questioning authorities and staging protests as well as submitting memorandums.
Protests against the order
Meanwhile, social media erupted with protests against the circular.
Also Read: We cannot tolerate anymore, don't pressurize us to quit education, say Muslim students
One section of users termed the order as unconstitutional. Another highlighted the portion of the high court interim judgment, which stated that the order was confined to institutions wherein the College Development Committees have prescribed the student dress code/uniform.
To this, the Minority Welfare Department responded that "as a government department, we have to go by the interpretation of the government."