Surendra Gadling's Bail Plea: Third Judge Recuses in Supreme Court

Advocate Surendra Gadling's bail plea in the 2016 Surjagarh arson case was mentioned in the Supreme Court. His lawyer, Kapil Sibal, requested a new bench after a third judge recused from hearing the case. Gadling has been in jail since 2018.

The petition filed by advocate Surendra Gadling seeking bail in the 2016 Surjagarh iron ore mine arson case was mentioned on Monday before the Supreme Court.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Gadling, mentioned the matter before a bench of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana, requesting that the matter be listed before some other bench, after a judge recused from hearing the case.

"My Lords listed it, but one of the judges recused," he said while asking the bench to assign the matter to a bench. Last week, Justice Shree Chandrashekhar recused from hearing Gadling's bail plea. Justice Chandrashekhar was the third judge who recused from hearing the case so far. Justice Atul Chandurkar and Justice MM Sundresh have recused so far.

Bhima Koregaon Link and Bail Plea Background

Gadling had filed an appeal challenging the Bombay High Court order denying him bail in the 2016 arson case. He has also been in custody in the Bhima Koregaon case being prosecuted by the NIA, under the UAPA, over alleged Maoist links, since June 2018. Earlier, Sibal had said that Gadling has been jailed for seven-and-a-half years and the apex court had issued notice on his bail plea in 2023, but the matter has witnessed recusals by the judges.

The Surjagarh Arson Case

The case relates to arson from 2016, when several vehicles carrying iron ore were burnt in Gadchiroli, Maharashtra, by individuals belonging to the banned organisation, the Communist Party of India (Maoist). Gadling, one of the several civil liberties activists in the Bhima Koregaon case, has been booked under stringent provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) for an alleged conspiracy to topple the government. He was booked under various provisions of the anti-terror law, the UAPA, and the Indian Penal Code. He was arrested in June 2018 by the Pune Anti-Terrorism Squad in the Bhima-Koregaon case.

The apex court was hearing Gadling's bail plea in connection with the 2016 Surjagarh iron ore mine arson case. The Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court on January 31, 2023, had refused to grant bail to Gadling. The High Court had noted that, prima facie, the accusations against him were true.

On December 25, 2016, Maoist rebels had allegedly set ablaze 76 vehicles that were being used for transporting iron ore from Surajgarh mines in Maharashtra's Gadchiroli. Allegations against Gadling are that he provided aid to Maoists, who were working at the ground level. As per the prosecution, he entered into a conspiracy with various co-accused, including some absconding in the case.

The prosecution had claimed that Gadling provided secret information about government activities and maps of certain areas to underground Maoist rebels. He was also accused of having asked the Maoists to oppose the operation of Surjagarh mines, and of having instigated many locals to join the movement. (ANI)

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by Asianet Newsable English staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)