SC mandates panic buttons, tracking devices in all public vehicles

The Supreme Court ordered all States/UTs to enforce rules for installing vehicle location tracking devices and panic buttons in public transport. It said no fitness certificate can be given without these features, crucial for passenger safety.

SC Mandates Safety Features in Public Transport

The Supreme Court on Wednesday directed all States and Union Territories to strictly enforce rules mandating the installation of vehicle location tracking devices and panic buttons in taxis and other public service vehicles.

A Bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and KV Viswanathan observed that it was alarming that less than one per cent of transport vehicles were equipped with vehicle location tracking systems. "We direct all States and Union Territories to strictly enforce Rule 125H of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 by ensuring the installation of vehicle location tracking devices and panic buttons in a time-bound and verifiable manner in both new and existing public service vehicles," it directed. It said such safety features are crucial for protecting passengers, especially women, senior citizens and children.

The top court made it clear that no public service vehicle can be granted a fitness certificate or transport permit unless it is fitted with Vehicle Location Tracking Devices (VLTDs) and emergency/panic buttons, and the installation of these features must also be reflected in the Vahan App.

Proposal for Pre-installed Devices

The apex court also endorsed the suggestion that vehicle manufacturers should install VLTDs and panic buttons in vehicles at the manufacturing stage itself before sale. To explore the feasibility of implementing such a measure, the bench directed the Central government to hold consultations with automobile manufacturers across the country and submit a report.

Court Addresses Other Road Safety Issues

The directions of the apex court came in a case concerning the implementation of road safety measures in India. It also said that there is effectively "no concept of lane driving in India", which is a major contributor to road accidents. "Lane driving is something which will reduce accidents considerably. Government must focus on it," said the bench while asking the Centre to look into this aspect.

The court also slammed several States for failing to submit reports on the implementation of rules mandating the installation of speed-limiting devices, or speed governors, in vehicles and underscored that all vehicle manufacturers are obligated to equip vehicles with such devices. It took critical note of the fact that the National Road Safety Board is yet to be set up despite earlier court directions and a last opportunity of three months for the formation of the board.

Background of the Case

The PIL was filed in the year 2012 by S Rajaseekaran, a Coimbatore-based orthopaedic surgeon who had raised concerns about the larger number of road accidents in the country. He sought directions for coordinated measures to prevent road accidents and strengthen existing infrastructure and post-accident care facilities, to reduce fatalities and injuries suffered by road accident victims.

Over the years, the apex court has been issuing directions in the case from time to time for road safety. (ANI)

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by Asianet Newsable English staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)