Delhi excise case: HC to hear all parties on July 16 after AAP leaders join

Delhi High Court has listed the excise policy case for hearing on July 16. The adjournment came after AAP leaders Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and Durgesh Pathak decided to participate in proceedings before the new Bench of Justice Manoj Jain.

A Bench of the Delhi High Court led by Justice Manoj Jain on Monday said it would hear all parties in the Delhi excise policy case on the next date after AAP leaders Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and Durgesh Pathak decided to participate in the proceedings before the present Bench. The matter has now been listed for hearing on July 16.

During the hearing, the Court observed, "We will hear everyone on the next date. We will have it somewhere in July." Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the CBI, suggested that if dates were to be fixed in July, the matter could be taken up on Wednesday. However, Justice Manoj Jain responded, "We will have it in July... we will find out from the registry, it seems some vakalatnama has been filed."

AAP Leaders End Boycott, Join Proceedings

Kejriwal, Sisodia and Pathak had earlier been boycotting the proceedings when the matter was being heard by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma. On Monday, it was indicated before the Court that the three leaders had now decided to participate in the proceedings before Justice Manoj Jain following the transfer of the matter.

Background of the CBI's Challenge

The case relates to the CBI's revision petition challenging a February 27 trial court order discharging Kejriwal and other accused in the Delhi excise policy case.

Earlier, the Delhi High Court had asked the CBI to formally inform Kejriwal, Sisodia and Pathak about the transfer of the matter from Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma to Justice Manoj Jain. The Court had observed that since the transfer had already been widely reported in the media, it presumed the concerned parties were aware of the reassignment.

At the previous hearing, the Court had remarked that "the ideal scenario would be when everybody is here, and everybody is heard," while also observing that after the appearance of all parties, it would consider whether anyone had objections regarding the present roster allocation before fixing a hearing schedule.

The Solicitor General had earlier argued that the case involved "serious allegations and scientific investigation" and submitted that the trial court's discharge order could not withstand judicial scrutiny.

Parallel Contempt Proceedings

The proceedings are taking place amid parallel contempt proceedings initiated by a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court against Kejriwal, Sisodia, Sanjay Singh and others over alleged remarks targeting Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma in connection with the excise policy case. (ANI)

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by Asianet Newsable English staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)