Former Indian spinner Laxman Sivaramakrishnan accuses Ashwin of disrespect ahead of his 100th Test

Ovaise Shariff |  
Published : Mar 06, 2024, 04:39 PM IST
Former Indian spinner Laxman Sivaramakrishnan accuses Ashwin of disrespect ahead of his 100th Test

Synopsis

Laxman Sivaramakrishnan has publicly expressed his disappointment with Ravichandran Ashwin, accusing the off-spinner of disregarding him ahead of his monumental 100th Test.

Former Indian spinner Laxman Sivaramakrishnan has voiced his discontent with Ravichandran Ashwin, accusing the off-spinner of a lack of respect. Sivaramakrishnan alleged that Ashwin ignored his attempts to convey wishes for his landmark 100th Test, cutting off calls and not responding to text messages. This incident, described as a form of "ghosting," prompted Sivaramakrishnan to express his disappointment in a post on X.

In response to tweets praising Ashwin, Sivaramakrishnan commented, "Tried calling him a few times to wish him for his 100th Test. Just cut off my call. Sent him a message, no reply. That's the respect we former cricketers get."

These accusations from Sivaramakrishnan triggered online trolling, with users recalling his previous critical statements about Ashwin from October last year. At that time, Sivaramakrishnan had made controversial remarks, labeling Ashwin a 'liability fielder' and the 'most unfit cricketer.' Confronted by fans, Sivaramakrishnan clarified his earlier statements.

PREV

Stay on top of all the latest Sports News, including Cricket News, Football News, WWE News, and updates from Other Sports around the world. Get live scores, match highlights, player stats, and expert analysis of every major tournament. Download the Asianet News Official App to never miss a sporting moment and stay connected to the action anytime, anywhere.

 

Read more Articles on

Recommended Stories

Ashes 3–0 Loading? Fans Celebrate Cummins' Return to Australia Squad, Declared 'RIP England'
IND vs SA: Why Did Jasprit Bumrah’s 100th T20I Wicket Spark Controversy in Cuttack? Explained