Oxford Union under fire for 'Independent State of Kashmir' debate, speaker's 'terror ties' sparks row

By Shweta Kumari  |  First Published Nov 14, 2024, 12:22 PM IST

The Oxford Union, known for its storied history of free and open debate, has ignited a firestorm of controversy with its latest debate titled, "This House Believes in an Independent State of Kashmir."


The Oxford Union, known for its storied history of free and open debate, has ignited a firestorm of controversy with its latest debate titled, "This House Believes in an Independent State of Kashmir." The proposed debate, set to take place on November 14, has sparked outrage among Indian diaspora with concerns mounting over what some call a blatant endorsement of an anti-India agenda.

The Oxford Union in its Instagram post alleged, "The continued push for Kashmiri independence has sustained a long-standing struggle, rooted in the region’s quest for self-determination and autonomy. This has led to persistent unrest, human rights concerns, and renewed demand for autonomy among the Kashmiris." It further claimed, "While nuclear-armed neighbours vie for control and geopolitical influence, the desire for peace among the population remains strong. Could an independent Kashmir be the answer to this enduring crisis?"

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Tap to resize

Latest Videos

Tap to resize

A post shared by The Oxford Union (@theoxfordunion)

Notably, controversial Pakistani-origin ‘activist’ Muzzammil Ayyub Thakur, known for peddling disinformation on Jammu and Kashmir, has been invited as one of the speakers for the debate.

The inclusion of Zafar Khan of the Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF) and Muzzamil Ayyub Thakur has raised concerns over providing platform to extremist ideologies and lack of respect for India’s sovereignty.

: 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐒𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐚𝐭 𝐎𝐱𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐝 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐧 𝐎𝐱𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐝 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐈𝐧𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐬 𝐋𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐓𝐞𝐫𝐫𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐦.

Indian students at Oxford University have voiced strong opposition to the Oxford Union’s… pic.twitter.com/MRKi6jFZl8

— Aditya Raj Kaul (@AdityaRajKaul)

 

⚡️TERROR LINKS? 🇮🇳Indian diaspora protests 🇬🇧Oxford University over promoting ‘Independent State of Kashmir’

The Oxford Union is planning a debate on Kashmir’s independence that would see speakers with suspected links to terrorism, the diaspora complained. pic.twitter.com/x8IWSQJESJ

— Sputnik India (@Sputnik_India)

Indian and British Hindu groups have voiced fierce opposition to the event, underscoring the concerning involvement of speakers with alleged terror ties, raising questions about the ethical responsibility of the Oxford Union in platforming such voices.

Oxford Union debate sparks uproar

Leading the opposition, INSIGHT UK recently sent a formal letter to the Oxford Union expressing concern and condemning not only the premise of the debate but also the decision to include members linked to the Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF), a group with a documented history of violence and terrorism charges, even on British soil. 

: British Hindus and Indians have sent a formal letter to Oxford Union expressing deep concerns over their decision to host a debate titled, “This House Believes in the Independent State of Kashmir,” on 14th Nov. The invitation of speakers with alleged links… pic.twitter.com/4XuJpy5l79

— Aditya Raj Kaul (@AdityaRajKaul)

In an additional layer to the controversy, Oxford Union’s current president, Ikram Israr, who is of Pakistani origin, is seen as further evidence of alleged anti-India bias. Critics argue that the Union's choice of debate topics under Israr’s leadership has taken a decidedly provocative turn, culminating in this latest motion on Kashmir's independence.

As expected, the continues to demonstrate its anti-India bias with the latest debate, pushing a damnable narrative. The motion proposed by the House & its Pakistani 🇵🇰 origin President , provocatively suggests that ‘the State of Kashmir’ (erroneously so, as… pic.twitter.com/9RKVQY2exQ

— Adit (@IndicSocietee)

Social media has erupted with statements accusing the Union of promoting anti-India rhetoric.

A user wrote, "This debate should have never been scheduled. It is purely inflammatory."

This debate should have never been scheduled. It is purely inflammatory.

— Raser (@rasergest)

 

Couldn't have expected anything else from Oxford or any other university from that genocidal country.

— क्षण भंगुर (@kshanabhangura)

Also read: BEWARE! 5 words & phrases you should NEVER Google to avoid being hacked or scammed

click me!