Asianet Newsable

Pakistan's Double Game Exposed! Is Islamabad Secretly Aiding US War Efforts Against Iran?

Anish Kumar — Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:13:06 +0530

New Delhi: Islamabad's public neutrality masks a covert military partnership that may be reshaping the West Asia conflict. While Pakistan's foreign minister has been shuttling between Tehran and Riyadh preaching restraint, and Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif has been condemning US strikes on Iran as violations of international law, a very different story may be unfolding behind closed doors.

The Covert Support Allegations

Multiple intelligence assessments circulating in regional security circles allege that Pakistan has been providing covert but material military support to US operations against Iran.

Even if the posts in circulation on social media are to be believed, it is among the most consequential acts of strategic deception in South Asian history.

The allegations are specific. Pakistani airspace is said to have been made available for US ISR operations and the basing of assets, including the MQ-9B armed surveillance drone.

Pakistan Air Force F-16s are alleged to have flown in active support of US carrier operations in the Arabian Sea. And perhaps most explosive of all, Pakistani naval assets are said to have been passing the positional data of Iranian vessels, including dhows operating beyond Pakistan's Exclusive Economic Zone, to American forces for targeting.

This comes even as Pakistan publicly maintains a policy of non-involvement and claims to support dialogue as the only sustainable path to peace. Pakistani defence authorities have specifically dismissed claims about US drones transiting Pakistani airspace as "entirely baseless and misleading."

A Familiar Strategic Playbook

But denial, as students of Pakistani strategic history will know, is part of the toolkit. During the Soviet-Afghan War, Pakistan denied for years that it was the CIA's primary conduit for arms to the Mujahideen. The pattern of public disavowal combined with covert operational alignment is not new. It is, in fact, a Pakistani institutional speciality.

The Technology Link: F-16 Upgrades

The technological evidence is suggestive. In December 2025, Washington approved a $686 million Foreign Military Sale to upgrade Pakistan's F-16 fleet, a package centred on Link-16 tactical data links and Mode 5 IFF cryptographic systems.

These are NATO-standard coalition warfare tools. They enable Pakistani aircraft to operate safely and seamlessly alongside American assets in shared airspace. The timing, coming months before the February 2026 outbreak of full-scale hostilities, raises questions that Islamabad has not publicly answered.

Strategic Gains for Islamabad

The strategic logic for Pakistan is not difficult to construct. With Gulf states, Turkey, and even the United Kingdom refusing Washington's basing access, the geometric value of Pakistan's western airspace and Arabian Sea coastline to US operations becomes immense.

For Islamabad, the currency of covert cooperation translates directly into arms packages, diplomatic leverage, and the restoration of its status as America's indispensable South Asian partner, a status badly shaken by the May 2025 India-Pakistan conflict and deepening US-India ties.

The Iran Factor: A Risky Gamble

The risks are equally stark. Iran shares a 900-kilometre border with Pakistan. It has demonstrated both the will and capability to conduct cross-border strikes, as seen when Iranian missiles hit Balochistan in January 2024.

An Iran that believed itself betrayed by a neighbour publicly claiming solidarity would have a powerful motivation and multiple vectors to retaliate. For now, Islamabad maintains its diplomat's mask. The mask, however, is beginning to slip.

See Your Name From Space: NASA Landsat Tool Becomes Internet Favourite | All You Need To Know

Divya Danu — Thu, 30 Apr 2026 15:11:15 +0530

Ever wondered how your name would look like if it were written across the Earth in giant letters? It sounds like something straight out of science fiction, but NASA is making it possible, at least virtually! A new online trend is quickly gaining popularity as people use a special tool linked to NASA's Landsat programme. It creates names using real satellite images of Earth, making each result feel personal, creative and amazingly real. Unlike many viral trends that rely on filters or heavy editing, this one uses actual images captured from space.

That simple idea has made it stand out online.

What is 'Your Name in Landsat'?

The "Your Name in Landsat" tool creates names and words using satellite images. Each letter typed by the user is matched with a real image from Earth that naturally resembles that letter.

These shapes can appear in deserts, rivers, forests, mountains, snowfields or coastlines. When placed together, they form a complete name or word.

The result looks artistic, clean and completely unique.

How the tool works

Using the tool is very easy and takes only a few seconds. First, users need to search for the official Landsat name generator online. Once the page opens, they can type their name, nickname or any short word.

Shorter words often produce the best results.

After that, the system automatically selects matching satellite images for each letter. The final image is then generated instantly.

Users can save it to their device or share it directly on social media. And we tried some, have a look:

Here's the link that you can use to create your own: https://science.nasa.gov/specials/your-name-in-landsat/

Why people are love it

The biggest reason for its growing popularity is its simplicity. There are no complicated steps, no editing skills required and no long waiting times.

People also enjoy the fact that the images are real. Each letter comes from an actual part of Earth captured by Landsat satellites.

That gives every design a special touch and makes it feel more meaningful than ordinary digital graphics.

A perfect mix of science and creativity

The trend has successfully combined science, technology and personal expression. It allows people to connect with Earth's landscapes in a fun and memorable way.

As more users discover it, "Your Name in Landsat" is likely to become even more popular across social media platforms.

Sometimes, the best online trends are the simplest ones.

Did Iran Accidentally Confirm Mojtaba Khamenei Is Dead? ‘Martyrs’ Mural Triggers Global Buzz (WATCH)

Asianet Newsable English — Sun, 26 Apr 2026 11:19:51 +0530

A newly unveiled mural in Iran has ignited a wave of speculation over the fate of Mojtaba Khamenei — the man widely believed to have succeeded Ali Khamenei. The artwork, displayed in Mashhad, honours prominent Iranians allegedly killed in US-Israeli attacks. But one detail has set off alarm bells: Mojtaba Khamenei’s image appears among the dead.

A Mural That Raises More Questions Than Answers

The mural was reportedly meant to commemorate those Iran claims were killed in recent hostilities involving the United States and Israel. Instead, it has triggered a far more sensitive question — has Iran inadvertently acknowledged the death of its new Supreme Leader?

A video circulating online show Mojtaba Khamenei featured alongside individuals officially declared dead. There has been no immediate clarification from Iranian authorities on why his image appears in that context.

Given the tightly controlled nature of information around Iran’s leadership, even a symbolic inclusion like this is being closely scrutinised.

Is this Iran admitting that its new Supreme Leader is dead?A mural honoring prominent Iranians killed by U.S-Israeli attacks was unveiled in Mashhad, Iran.It includes a picture of Mojtaba Khamenei!!pic.twitter.com/cDKLtKxSgq https://t.co/1nj3L7Mc0V

— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) April 26, 2026

Conflicting Reports About His Condition

The speculation comes just days after a report by The New York Times painted a very different picture.

According to the report: "Mojtaba Khamenei was seriously wounded in the US-Israeli airstrike that killed his father and predecessor Ali Khamenei but is mentally sharp."

Citing unnamed Iranian officials, the report added: "Although Mojtaba Khamenei was 'gravely wounded (in the February 28 airstrike), he is mentally sharp and engaged.'"

The injuries described were severe: "One leg was operated on three times, and he is awaiting a prosthetic. He had surgery on one hand and is slowly regaining function. His face and lips have been burned severely, making it difficult for him to speak."

The report also noted: "Access for security reasons is extremely limited to Khamenei, who remains in hiding, with only handwritten messages passed on."

Silence, Secrecy and Growing Doubt

Mojtaba Khamenei has not appeared in public since the reported strike. His absence — coupled with communication limited to written messages — has only deepened uncertainty.

The NYT report further stated: "At least for now" he has delegated decision-making to generals in the Revolutionary Guards.

It added that even senior commanders do not meet him directly, while Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian — a trained heart surgeon — has reportedly been involved in his care.

Symbolism or Slip-Up?

The mural in Mashhad now complicates the narrative.

Is it merely symbolic — grouping him with figures targeted in attacks? Or does it reflect something more serious that has not been publicly acknowledged?

In a country where state messaging is rarely accidental, the inclusion is difficult to dismiss outright. Yet without official confirmation, it remains in the realm of speculation.

'Gay Music' For Baby? Pregnant Woman's Viral TikTok Video Triggers Heated Internet Debate (WATCH)

Divya Danu — Sat, 25 Apr 2026 14:13:59 +0530

A light-hearted TikTok video has turned into a major social media debate after conservative journalist Cam Higby shared it on X. The clip shows a pregnant woman standing in her kitchen while playing music close to her baby bump. The song is Gimme! Gimme! Gimme! (A Man After Midnight) by ABBA. Text on the video reads: "POV you're pregnant with a boy and gotta make sure he turns out a little gay." The video was clearly presented as a joke, but it quickly became the centre of a heated argument online.

A mother posted on TikTok that she’s playing “gay” music next to her baby bump hoping that it will make her son gay. The entire comment section is FLOODED with to-be mothers and mothers sharing techniques they used or are using to make their own kids gay. This is DISGUSTING. pic.twitter.com/HqpybMv469

— Cam Higby (@camhigby) April 24, 2026

Cam Higby criticises the post

Higby reposted the video on X on April 24. He wrote that a mother was allegedly trying to make her unborn son gay by playing "gay music" to her baby bump. He also criticised comments from other users, saying many mothers were sharing similar "techniques".

Calling the trend "disgusting", his post quickly went viral. It has now been viewed more than 1.9 million times.

Social media splits into two camps

The reaction online was immediate and intense. Many users agreed with Higby and criticised the video. Some argued that a child's sexual orientation cannot be influenced by music or parenting choices.

Others said the entire thing was obviously a joke and that critics had completely missed the point. Several people mocked the outrage, saying internet users were taking a funny TikTok far too seriously.

Some users were deeply offended

A number of comments described the video as inappropriate. Some questioned why any parent would joke about their child's future sexuality.

I don't see the problem here. Mom's want their sons to be normal, to not want to oppress women anymore than they already are. Is it really so shocking that moms, you know, women, want their sons to not be straight, patriarchal assholes? This is progress and I say it needs to even…

— Tragik (@ItsTragik) April 24, 2026

Why would a mother do such a horrible thing to her unborn son? Child abuse right out of the gate

— Besthawk960 (@Besthawk960) April 25, 2026

Imagine being so deranged you pump gay anthems into your pregnant belly hoping for a mini-rainbow butt pirate. Science says you're wasting your time, and that kid will need therapy for having a psycho mom.

— RhB ️ (@Alu_ironside) April 25, 2026

Others argued that the clip conflicted with the common understanding that sexual orientation is something people are born with, not something that can be taught.

These comments helped push the debate even further.

Others defended the joke

Many users came to the creator's defence. They said the video was playful and not meant to be taken literally.

Some pointed out that ABBA has long been linked with LGBTQ+ culture, making the joke easy to understand for many viewers.

Others said the backlash showed how quickly online discussions can spiral out of control.

A wider debate about parenting and identity

The viral post has opened up broader conversations about parenting, sexuality and online humour. It has also highlighted how social media can turn a short joke into a major cultural argument within hours.

Experts have long said that sexual orientation is shaped by a complex mix of biological and developmental factors. It is not determined by a song played during pregnancy.

Why the video went viral

The combination of humour, politics and identity made the post highly shareable. People from across the political spectrum joined the discussion.

Some saw it as harmless fun. Others viewed it as a serious issue. That difference in interpretation is exactly why the video spread so quickly.

Why Oil Surged Four-Year High: Trump's Iran Blockade Threat Rattles World Markets

Divya Danu — Thu, 30 Apr 2026 16:22:11 +0530

Oil prices surged to a four-year high after Trump warned that the US blockade of Iranian ports could continue for months. Brent crude briefly crossed $126 a barrel as fears grew over prolonged disruption in Strait of Hormuz, a key global oil route.

Global oil prices jumped sharply on Thursday after US President Donald Trump warned that the American naval blockade of Iranian ports could continue for months.

Brent crude briefly surged more than seven percent, climbing above $126 a barrel, its highest level in four years. US benchmark West Texas Intermediate also jumped strongly, crossing $110 during Asian trading before easing later.

The sudden rise came as fears grew that tensions between the United States and Iran could drag on much longer than markets had expected.

According to reports, Trump has told his national security team to prepare for a prolonged blockade aimed at forcing Iran to abandon its nuclear programme.

The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump believes Iran is not negotiating honestly, even after Tehran submitted a fresh proposal this week to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

A White House official also said Trump had discussed ways to keep the blockade in place for months while limiting the impact on American consumers and global oil supplies.

Adding to concerns, Axios reported that Admiral Brad Cooper, the head of US Central Command, would brief Trump on possible new military strikes against Iran.

The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world's most important shipping routes. Around one-fifth of all global oil and gas passes through this narrow waterway.

Any threat to shipping in the region immediately worries traders, governments and businesses worldwide.

If the route remains blocked or heavily restricted, oil supplies could tighten quickly, pushing prices even higher.

That is exactly what markets are now fearing.

Trump has sent tough messages in public. On Truth Social, he said Iran "can't get their act together" and urged Tehran to agree to a non-nuclear deal.

He also posted an image of himself holding an assault rifle with the caption, "No More Mr. Nice Guy."

However, some analysts believe his words are harsher than his actual actions.

Michael Brown of Pepperstone said Trump's recent moves still suggest he prefers a negotiated deal rather than a major military escalation.

Still, the lack of progress in talks is making investors increasingly nervous.

Oil was the biggest mover, but other markets also felt the shock.

Brent crude later settled around $122, still up more than three percent. West Texas Intermediate traded near $108, also sharply higher.

Stock markets across Asia mostly fell as investors moved away from risky assets.

Tokyo, Hong Kong, Seoul and Mumbai each dropped more than one percent. Sydney, Taipei, Bangkok, Manila and Jakarta also ended lower.

Shanghai managed a small gain, while Singapore and Wellington also rose.

In Europe, Paris and Frankfurt declined, while London's FTSE 100 was little changed.

Higher oil prices can hurt the global economy.

They increase transport costs, raise fuel prices and can push inflation higher. That often leads central banks to keep interest rates elevated for longer.

Investors are especially sensitive right now because inflation has already been a major concern in many countries.

The US dollar also strengthened, as traders moved into safer assets during the uncertainty.

AI stocks provide some support

Despite the market turbulence, technology shares have continued to attract investors.

Samsung Electronics reported a massive 750 percent jump in first-quarter operating profit, driven by strong demand for AI-related chips.

Earlier, Microsoft, Meta and Google's parent company Alphabet also delivered better-than-expected earnings.

This AI boom has helped support global markets in recent weeks, even as geopolitical risks rise.

Investors are also watching the US Federal Reserve closely.

The Fed kept interest rates unchanged at its latest meeting, citing concerns that higher energy prices could fuel inflation.

Notably, four policymakers dissented from the decision, the highest number since 1992.

Three opposed signalling future rate cuts, while Stephen Miran pushed for an immediate quarter-point cut.

Jerome Powell's term as Fed Chair is ending soon, with Kevin Warsh set to take over next month.

What happens next?

Much now depends on whether Washington and Tehran can break their negotiating deadlock.

If talks improve, oil prices could fall back quickly.

But if the blockade continues or military action resumes, markets may face even more volatility.

For now, traders are preparing for a longer period of uncertainty.

That means higher oil prices, nervous stock markets and close attention to every statement coming from Washington and Tehran.

(With AFP inputs)

Trump Gala Shooting: Lawmakers Unite, Say Violence Has No Place in US

Asianet Newsable English — Sun, 26 Apr 2026 17:38:12 +0530

Washington witnessed a tense night as a shooting incident disrupted the high-profile White House Correspondents’ Dinner, forcing US President Donald Trump and top officials to be swiftly evacuated from the venue. Despite the chaos, the President, First Lady, and hundreds of attendees were brought to safety, prompting a rare moment of bipartisan unity against political violence.

Chaos at a Celebratory Evening

The annual White House Correspondents’ Dinner, held at the Washington Hilton, had drawn nearly 4,000 attendees, including politicians, journalists, and business leaders. What began as a carefully managed evening quickly spiraled into panic when gunshots were reported inside the venue.

Eyewitness Amit Kumar Sharma described the sudden shift in atmosphere: “Everything seemed fantastic and well managed,” he said, before recalling how “there was chaos and we were told that some gunshots have been fired.”

Trump Calls for Unity Amid Rising Tensions

Hours after the incident, President Trump addressed the nation, flanked by First Lady Melania Trump, Vice President J. D. Vance, FBI Director Kash Patel, and senior officials.

“I ask that all Americans recommit with their hearts in resolving our differences peacefully. We have to, we have to resolve our differences. I will say you had Republicans, Democrats, independents, conservatives, liberals, and progressives,” Trump said.

His appeal underscored growing concerns about political tensions in the country, especially in light of multiple recent threats.

Lawmakers Across Party Lines Condemn Violence

In the aftermath, leaders from both parties condemned the attack, emphasizing that violence has no place in American democracy.

Veteran Democrat Nancy Pelosi expressed relief and praised security forces: “The brave men and women of the United States Secret Service and local law enforcement are to be commended for their swift action to secure the scene and protect those present. As someone whose family has suffered political violence, my prayers are with the injured officer and all those affected by the trauma of these horrible incidents.”

New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani called the incident “totally unacceptable,” adding: “Political violence is absolutely unacceptable. I am glad the President and guests at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner are safe.”

Republican House Majority Leader Steve Scalise echoed similar sentiments: “This is an event meant to bring people together. Violence has NO place in our country.”

Eyewitness Accounts Reveal Moments of Fear

Those inside the hotel described confusion and fear as security personnel moved rapidly to contain the situation.

Congressman Suhas Subramanyam, who was present at the dinner, recounted a chilling moment: “I was walking down the escalators from the lobby when, at the bottom of the escalators, 2 security people with guns were running through and yelling 'watch out for crossfire.'”

“I got behind a pillar with another person, then left out a back exit while hearing more commotion and police. Thank you to Secret Service, Capitol Police, DC Metropolitan Police and all law enforcement for their quick response,” he said.

Calls for Calm and Gratitude for First Responders

Several lawmakers emphasized gratitude toward law enforcement while reiterating the need to reject violence.

Congressman Ro Khanna said: “My thoughts are with the brave Secret Service agent who was shot. Political violence is completely unacceptable. There is no place for it in our country.”

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer expressed similar concern, while Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal added: “Violence is never the answer.”

House Speaker Mike Johnson, who attended the event, said: “We’re grateful as always for the law enforcement and first responders who acted so quickly to bring the situation under control. Praying for our country tonight.”

A Pattern of Threats Looms Large

The incident comes against a troubling backdrop. President Trump has survived two assassination attempts in recent years — one at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania in July 2024, and another in Palm Beach, Florida in September 2024.

Saturday’s events have once again raised concerns about the safety of political figures and the deepening divisions within American society.

A Night That Ended in Relief — and Reflection

While no large-scale casualties were reported and the President remained unharmed, the psychological impact of the incident lingered among attendees.

What was meant to be an evening celebrating journalism and political dialogue instead turned into a stark reminder of the fragility of public safety in charged political times. Yet, amid the fear, there was also a clear, collective message from leaders across the spectrum: differences must be settled through dialogue — not violence.

'Stay Down, Duck Under the Table': How a ‘Lone Wolf’ Breach Sparked Panic at Trump’s First WHCA Dinner

Asianet Newsable English — Sun, 26 Apr 2026 10:38:12 +0530

It was meant to be a glitzy night with President Donald Trump addressing journalists at a Washington ballroom. But the glamor was shattered by gunshots that left guests diving to the floor and the US leader bundled out by security personnel.

Trump was seated on the stage at the White House Correspondents' Association's annual dinner -- the first time he attended as president -- when loud bangs disrupted the revelry and caused him and others to look up in alarm.

AFP journalists attending the event saw chaotic scenes unfolding.

Moments after what sounded like gunshots, cries of "Stay down!" and "Get down!" were heard while guests in black tie and gowns -- including correspondents, officials in the Trump administration and some members of his cabinet -- took cover.

Amid the chaos, the president and First Lady Melania Trump were quickly surrounded by US Secret Service agents, their weapons drawn. They quickly rushed Trump off the stage and through a back curtain as the crowd crouched in shock.

Trump said later he "thought it was a tray going down" before later realizing it was a gun. "It was either a tray or a bullet. I thought I was hoping it was a tray, but it wasn't."

‘Ducked under the table’

The big band music stopped, and for a few seconds a hush fell over the guests.

Agents swarmed around tables as plates crashed to the floor of the massive ballroom of the Washington Hilton, the very hotel where president Ronald Reagan survived an assassination attempt 45 years earlier.

"Shots fired upstairs," Mehmet Oz, Trump's administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, told journalists including AFP as he was evacuated by security.

Also seen being rushed out of the ballroom was Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr -- whose father Robert F Kennedy and uncle president John F Kennedy were felled by assassins' bullets in the 1960s.

Alexandra Ingersoll, a correspondent for One America News, told AFP she was inside when the commotion began, and saw Secret Service spring into action to protect the president.

"I just ducked under the table and I was like 'I'm not going to risk this,'" she told AFP. "I didn't know if the shooter was neutralized or what was going on."

Trump later told reporters that a gunman he described as a "lone wolf" and a "whack job" had charged through security screening just outside the ballroom.

‘Fought like hell’

The entire room was ordered evacuated, and several hundred guests made their way into the Hilton lobby and out into the chilly air.

Guests were seen hugging, making calls, texting friends and loved ones, and their news bureaux.

Trump's motorcade zoomed out of the Hilton a few minutes after 8:40 pm and headed for the White House.

Correspondents then raced to the mansion for a hastily arranged presidential press conference.

Trump, still in black tie, appeared at the podium in the White House briefing room with Melania Trump, Vice President JD Vance, FBI chief Kash Patel and other top officials.

"I fought like hell to stay" at the dinner but Secret Service agents said he had to leave, said Trump, who narrowly escaped an assassination attempt at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania in 2024

Trump added however that the gala would be rescheduled.

"We're going to do it again," said Trump. “We're not gonna let anyone take over our society.”

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by Asianet Newsable English staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Trump Factor, Shooting Scare, Epstein Shadow: Why King Charles III’s US Visit Is a Tightrope Walk

Sunita Iyer — Mon, 27 Apr 2026 13:56:09 +0530

King Charles III arrives in Washington for a four-day state visit at a moment that feels anything but routine. What should have been a symbolic exercise in renewing the so-called “special relationship” has instead become a delicate balancing act—set against political unpredictability, security concerns, and lingering royal controversies.

With the 250th anniversary of American independence as the backdrop, the British monarch has been tasked with “reaffirming and renewing” ties with the United States. But the circumstances surrounding the visit have turned it into one of the most complex diplomatic missions of his reign.

A visit with an unusually high degree of difficulty

Historians are not understating the stakes. Contemporary political historian Anthony Seldon described the April 27–30 visit as “obviously beyond tricky,” noting it carries a “degree of difficulty” rarely seen in modern statecraft.

He compared it to historic moments of strain in transatlantic relations—between Lyndon B Johnson and Harold Wilson, Richard Nixon and Edward Heath, and even Dwight Eisenhower and Anthony Eden during the fallout of the Suez Crisis.

“But this is different,” Seldon suggested, largely because of the unpredictability of Donald Trump. “Because you are dealing with somebody who is so unpredictable,” he was quoted as saying in The Guardian report.

Yet Seldon also pointed to a curious advantage: Charles may be one of the few figures Trump is unlikely to antagonise openly. That, he argued, could give the monarch some room to manoeuvre. This is, in Seldon’s words, “the most important visit of the king’s life”—one where he could either “be very cautious and safe” or subtly remind Americans of the principles on which their nation was founded.

Security concerns sharpen after Washington shooting

The visit unfolds just days after a shooting disrupted the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, forcing the evacuation of top officials, including Trump.

UK officials insist that security is being taken “very seriously.” Treasury minister Darren Jones confirmed that “appropriate security” measures are in place and that discussions are ongoing between British and American teams.

“There were already extensive discussions taking place, which will continue over the coming days,” he said, underlining the fluid nature of the planning.

Behind the scenes, Buckingham Palace is in constant coordination with US authorities, assessing whether the weekend’s events require further adjustments to what was already a tightly controlled visit.

A speech that could define the visit

At the heart of the trip lies a moment that could shape its legacy: King Charles III's address to a joint session of Congress.

The speech will be televised globally, and expectations are high. Buckingham Palace has indicated that the King will “recognise the challenges that our countries face.” But striking the right tone will be crucial—especially given Trump’s reputation for taking offence.

When Queen Elizabeth II addressed Congress in 1991, she spoke of the dangers of power that grows “from the barrel of a gun” and emphasised NATO, liberal values, and cultural diversity. According to historian Philip Murphy, such language today “would be taken as a direct attack on Trump.”

Instead, Charles is expected to take a more nuanced route—appealing “almost over the head of Trump to the American public.” The message, Murphy suggested, will likely emphasise shared values: democracy, freedom, and a long-standing cultural bond.

Seldon believes the King may not need to mention Trump at all. A carefully crafted speech, “very deftly, gently, and in a polite and respectful way,” could remind Americans of their foundational ideals—leaving listeners to draw their own conclusions about whether current leadership aligns with those principles.

Private talks, public risks

One of the most sensitive moments of the visit will take place behind closed doors: a private meeting between Charles and Trump in the Oval Office.

The decision to keep discussions private—limited to a brief photo opportunity—appears deliberate. It follows global attention on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s recent diplomatic discomfort in Washington.

Charles enters the room aware of past tensions. Trump has previously criticised the UK prime minister and mocked British military capabilities. As monarch, Charles is also head of state of Canada—a country that has faced its own provocations from Trump.

“He’ll be very careful about what he says,” Murphy noted, adding that anything discussed privately could easily find its way into the public domain. “I don’t think Trump has a strong sense of what is private and what is not.”

Lingering shadows: Epstein and royal rifts

Beyond geopolitics, the visit is shadowed by unresolved royal controversies.

Questions surrounding Jeffrey Epstein and his connections to the British royal family have resurfaced. Calls from US figures, including Congresswoman Ro Khanna, for the King and Queen Camilla to meet Epstein survivors have been firmly declined by the palace. Officials argue such a meeting could interfere with ongoing investigations and legal proceedings.

At the same time, the absence of any interaction with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle—who live in California—underscores the continuing distance within the royal family. No reunion is planned during the visit.

There is also the risk of protests or public disruptions, though the itinerary has been carefully designed to minimise unscripted encounters. A single “block party” appearance in Virginia may be the only moment where the King and Queen come into direct contact with the public.

A moment of risk—and opportunity

For all its risks, the visit also offers King Charles III a chance to reshape perceptions.

After years dominated by headlines about royal disputes and scandal, this trip provides an opportunity to demonstrate the enduring relevance of the monarchy on the global stage.

As Murphy put it, “one talks about the risks, but there’s also a benefit for him here.” By rising above political divisions and focusing on shared values, Charles may yet reinforce a relationship that has weathered crises before.

Whether he succeeds will depend not just on diplomacy, but on tone, timing—and a careful reading of a moment where symbolism and politics are tightly intertwined.

Trump Gala Shooting: How Did Gunman Cole Allen Breach Event? Security Questions Mount

Asianet Newsable English — Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:16:55 +0530

US President Donald Trump and other attendees at a glitzy media gala in Washington made a hasty exit Saturday night after gunshots were fired. As details continue to emerge and investigations are underway, here is what we know about the shooting:

What happened in the ballroom?

Shots were heard after the welcoming speech at the annual dinner of the White House Correspondents' Association being held at the Washington Hilton Hotel, according to AFP reporters and other witnesses.

Tactical security teams with guns drawn took position on the stage where Trump was seated alongside his wife Melania, Vice President JD Vance and other cabinet members, who were swiftly evacuated.

Hundreds of guests in black tie in the ballroom took cover under tables and later made their way into the hotel lobby and then outdoors as the event was postponed.

Authorities said no dignitaries or gala guests were hurt.

How did the shooting unfold?

A "sole gunman" rushed through a security checkpoint in the hotel lobby just outside the ballroom where the dinner was taking place around 8:36 pm (0036 GMT), according to authorities.

Trump shared footage on his Truth Social platform which appeared to show the suspect charging at the checkpoint before being swarmed by officers.

"He was armed with a shotgun, a handgun and multiple knives," Metropolitan Police Department interim chief Jeffery Carroll told reporters.

Law enforcement exchanged gunfire with the suspect and "intercepted that individual."

A uniformed Secret Service officer was "struck in his vest" and taken to hospital, but was doing well, Carroll said.

The suspect was not hit by gunfire, but was taken to a hospital to be evaluated.

He was in custody and due to be arraigned on Monday in a federal court.

The detained man, who officials believed was staying as a guest at the hotel, is thought to be the only suspect in the case.

He is facing charges on two counts: using a firearm during a crime of violence, and assault on a federal officer using a dangerous weapon, US Attorney Jeanine Pirro said.

Who is the suspect?

Trump shared photos of the suspected shooter, shirtless and in handcuffs facedown on a carpeted floor, in what appears to be the Hilton lobby.

Authorities are yet to publicly confirm his identity, but multiple US news outlets reported that the suspect was a 31-year-old named Cole Tomas Allen from Torrance, California.

FBI agents were seen outside a two-story residence in Torrance late Saturday, according to an AFP photographer.

"My impression is he was a lone wolf," Trump said, adding that the suspect's motivation was not yet clear but he believed the gunman was "sick."

A LinkedIn profile with the name "Cole Allen" showed a picture of a man which appeared to match a photo of the suspect shared by Trump.

The social media profile said Allen was a mechanical engineer, computer scientist, game developer and teacher.

A person named Cole Allen graduated from the California Institute of Technology in 2017 with an undergraduate degree, the university told the New York Times.

C2 Education, a test-prep company, named Allen as "teacher of the month" in an Instagram post dated December 2024.

Were there security failures?

Questions swirled regarding the security at the reception and how a gun was brought into the hotel.

Attendees pointed out that there was a magnetometer placed outside the ballroom, but there was no such screening before that or at the entrance to the hotel itself.

Trump initially said it was "not a particularly secure building," but later said the ballroom where the event was being held was not breached by the gunman and was "very, very secure."

The checkpoint that the suspect tried to charge past was "right outside the ballroom," authorities said.

"Because that checkpoint worked, there was no one who was injured," Pirro said.

"We'll go through video across the hotel to figure out how the gun got in, how it got down here," Carroll added.

According to Trump, the security services did a "much better job than Butler," where he was the target of an assassination attempt in 2024 during a campaign rally in the state of Pennsylvania.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by Asianet Newsable English staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Elon Musk Warns 'AI Could Kill Us All' As OpenAI Court Battle With Sam Altman Begins

Divya Danu — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:35:39 +0530

A dramatic legal battle between two of the world's biggest technology figures has begun in California. Elon Musk and Sam Altman appeared in federal court together for the first time on Tuesday as they fight over the future of OpenAI. The case is about much more than money. It is about what OpenAI was created to do, how it changed over the years, and whether that change broke the promises made when the company was founded.

Musk says OpenAI has moved far away from its original goal of building artificial intelligence for the benefit of humanity. OpenAI strongly denies this. The trial could have a huge impact on one of the world's most powerful AI companies.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by CNBC (@cnbc)

Elon Musk's stark warning about artificial intelligence

While giving evidence, Musk once again shared his deep concerns about artificial intelligence. He told the court that AI could become either humanity's greatest invention or its greatest threat.

"It could kill us all," Musk said.

He compared two possible futures. One was the hopeful world shown in Star Trek, where technology helps humanity thrive. The other was the dark future of Terminator, where machines turn against humans.

"We don't want a Terminator outcome," Musk told the court. "We want a Star Trek outcome."

It was a classic Musk moment, mixing science fiction with serious warnings.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by CNN (@cnn)

Why Musk says OpenAI was created

Musk explained that his worries about AI are not new.

He said they go back to a conversation with Google co-founder Larry Page in 2015. According to Musk, Page was very optimistic about advanced AI, but Musk felt the dangers were being ignored.

Musk told the court that this conversation pushed him to act. He and Sam Altman, along with several others, founded OpenAI later that year as a nonprofit organisation.

Their goal was simple: to develop powerful AI safely and make sure it benefited everyone, not just one company. Musk said OpenAI was meant to be an alternative to Google, with openness and safety at its core.

The meaning behind Musk's 'speciesist' comment

One of the most talked-about moments came when Musk recalled a heated discussion with Larry Page. "The reason OpenAI exists is that Larry Page called me a speciesist," Musk said.

A speciesist is someone who values human life above other forms of intelligence. Musk took that as a badge of honour. He has long argued that AI should serve humans, not replace them.

That belief remains central to his case.

How OpenAI changed

OpenAI started as a nonprofit, but building advanced AI quickly became extremely expensive. Huge amounts of money were needed for computer chips, data centres and top researchers.

To raise those funds, OpenAI created a for-profit arm. Musk says he accepted this move, but only under strict conditions. He told the court he was comfortable with a small business arm, as long as the nonprofit stayed in control.

In his view, that balance later disappeared.

Microsoft's huge investment

The turning point, Musk says, came when Microsoft invested billions in OpenAI. Microsoft poured around $10 billion into the company in 2023, deepening a partnership that had already been growing for years.

Musk argues that this shifted OpenAI's focus away from the public good and towards profits.

He believes Microsoft's influence became too strong. His lawyer compared the situation to a museum selling off its most valuable paintings and locking them away from the public.

What Musk wants from the lawsuit

Musk is seeking billions of dollars. His lawyers say this money should be returned to OpenAI's nonprofit arm. He also wants major changes to the company's leadership and structure. That could include the removal of Sam Altman.

If Musk wins, OpenAI's future could look very different.

OpenAI hits back

OpenAI rejects Musk's claims completely. Its lawyers say the company never promised to remain a nonprofit forever. They also say there was never any promise that all OpenAI technology would always be made public.

According to OpenAI, Musk understood the business plans years ago.

The company argues that he only became unhappy after OpenAI succeeded without him.

The xAI factor

A key part of OpenAI's defence is timing. Musk did not file his lawsuit until 2024, after he had launched his own AI company, xAI.

OpenAI says that is no coincidence.

Its lawyers argue that Musk is trying to slow down a powerful rival. They say this is less about principle and more about competition.

OpenAI's claims against Musk

OpenAI also made some sharp accusations. The company says Musk promised to contribute up to $1 billion when OpenAI was founded.

According to OpenAI, he ultimately provided only about $38 million over five years. Lawyers also claimed Musk once wanted either himself or Tesla to control OpenAI.

When that did not happen, they say, he walked away.

The split between Musk and Altman

Musk left OpenAI in 2018 after disagreements over the company's direction. At the time, OpenAI was still years away from global fame.

That fame arrived in 2022 when ChatGPT was launched. The chatbot became an overnight success and turned OpenAI into one of the most valuable private companies in the world.

Musk, who had once helped launch the organisation, was now on the outside.

A rivalry turns public

The relationship between Musk and Altman has become increasingly hostile. Their disagreements have played out on social media, in interviews and now in court.

Last year, Musk and a group of investors reportedly offered nearly $100 billion to buy OpenAI's assets.

OpenAI rejected the offer.

Altman then jokingly offered to buy Musk's social media platform X for a fraction of that amount.

Musk replied with a single word: "Swindler."

That exchange showed just how bitter things had become.

Inside the courtroom

The atmosphere in court was reportedly tense. Musk sat with his legal team near the judge. Altman and OpenAI president Greg Brockman sat nearby in the public gallery.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by @abc7newsbayarea

Altman watched quietly for much of the hearing. He left shortly before Musk took the witness stand. Musk spoke calmly, occasionally taking sips of water as he answered questions.

Judge steps in over social media

Before testimony began, OpenAI complained about Musk's recent posts online. The company said some of his comments could influence the trial.

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers agreed that both sides needed to be careful.

She instructed Musk, Altman and their teams to avoid making inflammatory public statements during the case.

Both men agreed.

Given their history, that may be easier said than done.

The crucial Elon Musk Vs Sam Altman case

This is not just a personal feud. The outcome could reshape OpenAI and influence the wider AI industry. OpenAI is reportedly considering a future stock market listing.

A ruling against the company could complicate those plans. It could also force changes to its structure, governance and leadership.

That would send shockwaves across Silicon Valley.

The bigger question: who controls AI?

At its heart, this trial is about control. Should powerful AI be developed by nonprofit organisations focused on the public good?

Or is commercial investment necessary to build systems that require enormous resources?

That question matters far beyond OpenAI.

It will help shape the future of artificial intelligence.

Elon Musk's wider concerns

Elon Musk has long warned about AI. He believes machines may one day surpass human intelligence. He says that moment is approaching quickly.

His brain-chip company, Neuralink, is partly aimed at helping humans keep pace. Musk argues that connecting the human brain directly with computers could create a safer future.

He calls this "AI-human symbiosis".

Whether that happens remains to be seen.

What's next?

Musk will return to the witness stand on Wednesday. OpenAI's lawyers will begin cross-examining him. That is likely to be one of the most closely watched moments of the trial.

Both sides have strong arguments. Both have enormous stakes.

And both are fighting over the future of one of the most important companies in the world.

A battle bigger than two men

This case is about more than Elon Musk and Sam Altman. It is about trust, money, power and the future of artificial intelligence.

OpenAI helped launch the modern AI boom.

Now the company that promised to build AI for everyone must defend how it changed.

Musk says he is protecting OpenAI's founding mission. OpenAI says Musk is simply trying to damage a competitor.

A jury will now help decide who is right.

Whatever the outcome, the result will shape the next chapter of the AI revolution.

(With inputs from agencies)

Pune Police Asks Three Americans To Leave India! The Reason Will Shock You

Divya Danu — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:47:16 +0530

Pune City Police have asked three American nationals to leave India by May 10, 2026, after finding that they were allegedly involved in activities not allowed under their tourist visas. The three men, aged 53, 65 and 66, had arrived in India between April 19 and April 21.

What police found

According to Pune Police, the three were visiting India on tourist visas. However, an enquiry found that they were allegedly distributing religious pamphlets and speaking to local people about Christianity. Police said such activities are not allowed under a tourist visa.

The order was issued under the Immigration and Foreigners Act after officials concluded that the visa rules had been violated.

How the case came to light

The matter surfaced on April 27 in Pune's Shukrawar Peth area. Police said the three approached a private cab driver and handed him pamphlets printed in English, Hindi and Marathi. They also allegedly tried to convince him about their religious beliefs.

The cab driver became suspicious and informed police officers who were deployed nearby for a rally.

Police enquiry and action

The three foreigners were taken to a local police station, where officers checked their passports and visa documents.

A search of their belongings reportedly led to the recovery of a large quantity of religious literature.

The Foreigners Registration Office then carried out a detailed enquiry. Officials found that the trio had allegedly breached the conditions of their tourist visas by engaging in religious preaching and teaching.

Deadline to leave India

Based on the findings, Pune Police issued a "Leave India Notice". The three American nationals have been directed to leave the country on or before May 10, 2026.

Authorities have said the action was taken strictly under immigration rules.

High School Sweetheart Story Ends in Horror, Husband Shoots Wife, Commits Suicide in Pennsylvania

Vaishnav Akash — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 12:07:14 +0530

A young Pennsylvania couple who were high school sweethearts died in a murder-suicide early Tuesday, police confirmed. Authorities said 26-year-old Ryan Hosso fatally shot his wife, 25-year-old physician assistant Madeline Spatafore, inside their Butler home before taking his own life in nearby woods.

According to Pennsylvania State Police, Hosso called his parents after killing Spatafore, confessing to the crime and threatening suicide. His parents alerted authorities around 1:15 a.m. Officers arrived to find Spatafore dead inside the residence. Using thermal drones, police later located Hosso’s body in the woods.

Spatafore sustained multiple gunshot wounds, while Hosso died from a single self-inflicted injury. The couple had married in September 2024 in Ohio, less than two years before the tragedy.

Community Shock

Both Hosso and Spatafore graduated from Seneca Valley High School in Harmony, Pennsylvania, just miles from their home in Seven Fields. Friends and neighbors described them as inseparable since their teenage years.

Spatafore, who graduated high school in 2019, went on to Duquesne University, earning her degree in health services summa cum laude in 2023. She was employed as a critical care physician assistant at UPMC Presbyterian at the time of her death.

Hosso’s career path was less clear. His LinkedIn profile listed work as a mechanical engineer at Vavco, a Pittsburgh-based firm in the oil and gas sector.

Police Investigation

Authorities continue to investigate the circumstances leading up to the murder-suicide. Hosso’s parents reported his erratic behavior during the call, but no prior public record of domestic disputes has surfaced.

The Cranberry Eagle reported that police relied on advanced drone technology to track Hosso’s movements after he fled the home. The case has drawn widespread attention in Butler County, where the couple’s ties to the community run deep.

What Happened To The Steak And Lobster After White House Dinner Was Evacuated?

Divya Danu — Mon, 27 Apr 2026 17:25:03 +0530

After gunshots disrupted the 2026 White House Correspondents' Dinner, social media became obsessed with one question: What happened to the steak and lobster meant for 2,600 guests? Many attendees had only finished their salad before evacuating.

What was supposed to be one of Washington's biggest social and political nights quickly turned into a frightening security emergency. But after the panic faded, social media found itself focused on a very different question: what happened to the expensive steak and lobster dinner that was never fully served?

The 2026 White House Correspondents' Dinner at the Washington Hilton was suddenly interrupted on Saturday night after gunshots were reported near the venue. Guests, including US President Donald Trump, First Lady Melania Trump, Vice President JD Vance, senior officials, journalists and celebrities, were rushed to safety.

As the room emptied and security teams took over, thousands of untouched meals were left behind.

The White House Correspondents' Dinner is one of the biggest events in Washington each year. It brings together politicians, journalists, business leaders and entertainers under one roof.

My wife and I are wondering what happened to the steak and lobster for 2,600 ppl that never got served at last night’s #WHCD? pic.twitter.com/TNDT7l12NH

— Nico Perrino (@NicoPerrino) April 26, 2026

This year's menu was especially impressive. Guests began with a spring pea and burrata salad. The main course was prime chateaubriand with Maine lobster, served alongside whipped potato gratin and roasted vegetables. Dessert was a rich Grand Opera Cake with espresso cream and chocolate ganache.

The meal was designed by Executive Sous Chef Hyun In Sun and Executive Chef Daniel Bennett.

Chaos at #WHCD as secret service pulls cabinet officials out of the Hilton ballroom and swarms stage where VP, POTUS out. We have just been informed that program will resume momentarily. pic.twitter.com/TmLQ9rvEVU

— Sara Fischer (@sarafischer) April 26, 2026

"Stay down!"President Trump and others are evacuated from White House Correspondents' Association Dinner.#WHCD #WHCA #NerdProm Watch LIVE here: https://t.co/OQnyC97cOI pic.twitter.com/CllmnyjoWD

— CSPAN (@cspan) April 26, 2026

But many guests never made it past the starter.

Less than an hour into the evening, around 8:30 pm local time, loud popping sounds were heard near the back of the ballroom.

At first, many people were unsure what was happening. Then panic spread quickly.

The scene from the red carpet at the #WHCD moments after multiple shots fired on the other side of the doors to the ballroom. pic.twitter.com/oDpopfwxSg

— Kevin Walling (@KevinPWalling) April 26, 2026

Guests ducked under tables. Plates crashed to the floor. Waiters dropped trays as security officers moved in.

President Trump, Melania Trump and Vice President Vance were immediately escorted out by the Secret Service. Other senior officials were also evacuated.

A suspect was later taken into custody, and one law enforcement officer was injured during the incident.

According to BBC report, Cole Tomas Allen, the 31-year-old man accused in the White House Correspondents' Dinner shooting, is from Torrance, California, and is believed to have worked for a tutoring company that helps college students. He describes himself online as a mechanical engineer, game developer and teacher.

He studied mechanical engineering at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech), where he was also involved in the university's Christian fellowship.

Connor Sheets, a journalist with the Los Angeles Times, told the BBC that people who knew Allen said he was deeply committed to his faith and actively involved in his local church. Former colleagues and students described him as quiet, peaceful and highly intelligent.

Once the immediate danger had passed, social media users turned their attention to an unusual mystery.

Nico Perrino posted on X, asking, "What happened to the steak and lobster for 2,600 people that never got served?"

His post quickly went viral.

Thousands joined the conversation. Some were genuinely curious. Others simply could not resist joking about the fate of such a luxurious meal.

Sliced Steak sandwich special and Lobster bisque all week… hopefully the staff had a great meal and leftovers to take home.

— Anitra Carr (@anitrasings) April 27, 2026

@SecWar serves steak and lobster to the troops. Wait, that's the WHCA menu. pic.twitter.com/3qIjUGShCf

— A (@aeb3059) April 27, 2026

Press correspondence dinner menu. For the same media folks who complained when our troops had a lobster before being deployed. pic.twitter.com/3GRARwZgt8

— Representative Marie Hopkins (@MarieForRI) April 27, 2026

After all, this was no ordinary dinner. It was a feast prepared for more than 2,600 guests.

So, what likely happened?

The Washington Hilton has not officially commented on the exact fate of the meals. However, hospitality experts say there are only a few likely possibilities.

Food that had already been plated and left unattended for too long would almost certainly have been thrown away for safety reasons. Strict health rules would make serving it later impossible.

Unplated food, however, may have been handled differently.

Large hotels often donate untouched food when local laws and safety rules allow. It may also have been shared with hotel staff, kitchen workers, security teams and emergency responders.

Of course, the internet prefers a more entertaining answer.

Many joked that hotel employees probably enjoyed "the best staff meal in Washington history."

A night journalists will never forget

Several reporters later described the terrifying moments inside the ballroom.

NPR White House correspondent Franco Ordoñez said people had just finished their salads when the sounds rang out.

Within seconds, plates, trays and glasses were crashing everywhere.

Courtney Dorning of NPR recalled one member of the waiting staff crying in fear while hiding beside a table.

That moment, she said, would stay with her forever.

Hundreds of guests remained under tables until security gave the all-clear.

Many then quickly returned to work, reporting on the very event they had just lived through.

A dinner remembered for very different reasons

The White House Correspondents' Dinner is usually remembered for jokes, speeches and memorable moments.

This year, it will be remembered for something else entirely.

The security scare overshadowed the entire evening. Yet, in typical internet fashion, humour soon returned.

Memes about abandoned lobster, lonely steaks and confused waiters flooded social media.

In times of stress, people often look for small, human details. And few details are more relatable than wondering about a very expensive dinner left sitting in a ballroom.

The meal may be gone, but the questions remain

Whether the steak and lobster were discarded, donated or enjoyed backstage, one thing is certain: they became almost as famous as the dinner itself.

The White House Correspondents' Association is expected to reschedule the event.

When it does, guests will likely have two questions.

First, will security be even tighter?

And second, what will be on the menu next time?

Because in Washington, politics may dominate the headlines, but sometimes dinner steals the show.

'Every Time Your Polls Drop...': Iran's Lego-Style Video Mocks Trump Over White House Dinner Shooting (WATCH)

Asianet Newsable English — Mon, 27 Apr 2026 09:26:20 +0530

A bizarre and sharply satirical video has surfaced online in the aftermath of the shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner in Washington, with Iran-linked creators taking aim at US President Donald Trump through a Lego-style animated “diss track.”

The video, which has quickly gone viral across social media platforms, uses a rap format to mock Trump’s leadership and question the narrative surrounding the dramatic evacuation during the high-profile event.

Also read: Trump rejects WHCA dinner shooter's manifesto, calls him 'sick'

Satire meets geopolitics

At first glance, the clip appears playful — Lego-like characters, bright visuals, and a catchy beat. But the messaging is anything but light.

The track delivers pointed criticism of Trump’s leadership style, accusing his administration of manipulating public perception during moments of crisis. One of its central lines states: "Every time your polls drop, you pull up the same scheme."

The implication is clear: the video suggests that moments of chaos are politically convenient, used to divert attention when approval ratings dip.

Another biting line reads: "Snowflake ego so high, can't handle the smoke. Hire the mentalist, so you don't get roasted."

The lyrics repeatedly target Trump’s personality, portraying him as thin-skinned and overly concerned with image.

Holy shit, how is Iran banging these LEGO videos out so damn quickly?"Shots fired, whole place got swatted out...Staging the whole sceneEvery time your polls drop lowYou pull this same scheme."Even THEY think it was staged.pic.twitter.com/O7uv6ykxib

— BrooklynDad_Defiant!☮️ (@mmpadellan) April 26, 2026

Referencing the dinner chaos

The timing of the video is significant. It comes just after the disruption at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, where reports of gunfire triggered panic inside the venue.

Trump, who was speaking at the time, was swiftly escorted out by security personnel. Guests — including First Lady Melania Trump, Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth — were later evacuated in an orderly but tense sequence.

The video leans heavily into that moment, using phrases like "empty plates," "rushed exit," and "staged scene" to suggest the incident was more spectacle than substance.

It goes further, claiming that despite the panic, “nothing actually happened,” framing the episode as confusion amplified into drama.

A narrative battle

Beyond the mockery, the video underscores a deeper message — that control over narratives differs across borders.

One recurring theme suggests that while Trump may shape media discourse within the United States, he cannot extend that influence globally, particularly in adversarial regions like Iran.

Another lyric drives this point home: "You control the dinner, but you lost the same. You control the narrative, but you still a loser."

The track also hints at economic dissatisfaction and eroding support, claiming: "MAGA waking up, country going broke."

Also read: Trump Gala Shooting: Lawmakers Unite, Say Violence Has No Place in US

More than just a one-off

This is not the first time such content has emerged. Analysts note a pattern of AI-generated, satirical videos linked to pro-Iran networks targeting Trump.

Earlier this month, YouTube took down a channel associated with “Explosive Media,” a group widely suspected of ties to Iranian influence operations. The creators had built a following with similar Lego-style videos mocking Trump and US politics.

The latest clip appears to follow that template — visually engaging, easily shareable, and politically loaded.

Humour with an edge

While the video is framed as satire, its tone is unmistakably sharp. It portrays Trump as “super fragile,” claims he is mocked behind closed doors, and suggests that public strength is merely performative.

Its viral spread highlights how political messaging is evolving — blending humour, AI-generated visuals, and music to reach younger, digital-first audiences.

What might once have been dismissed as fringe content is now part of a broader information ecosystem, where memes and music videos double as geopolitical commentary.

Why it matters

The emergence of such content points to an ongoing digital narrative war — one where perception can be shaped not just through official statements, but through viral culture.

In this case, a Lego-style rap video has managed to capture global attention, turning a moment of confusion in Washington into an international talking point — and a fresh front in the long-running tension between the US and Iran.

WHCA dinner shooting: PM Modi relieved Trump, Melania, Vance are safe

Asianet News Central — Sun, 26 Apr 2026 10:46:20 +0530

Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed relief on Sunday that US President Donald Trump, First Lady Melania Trump, and Vice President JD Vance were safe following the shooting at the White House Correspondents' Dinner in Washington.

On Saturday evening (local time), suspected gunshots were reportedly fired in the lobby of the Washington Hilton, leading to the evacuation of US President Donald Trump and other senior officials from the White House Correspondents' Dinner.

PM Modi: 'Violence has no place in a democracy'

Taking to X, PM Modi condemned the attack and affirmed that "violence has no place in a democracy". He also expressed well wishes to the US President and other cabinet members present at the event.

"Relieved to learn that President Trump, the First Lady and Vice President are safe and unharmed following the recent security incident at a Washington DC hotel. I extend my best wishes for their continued safety and well-being. Violence has no place in a democracy and must be unequivocally condemned," the PM wrote.

Relieved to learn that President Trump, the First Lady and Vice President are safe and unharmed following the recent security incident at a Washington DC hotel. I extend my best wishes for their continued safety and well-being. Violence has no place in a democracy and must be…

— Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) April 26, 2026

President Donald Trump, First Lady Melania Trump, and Vice President JD Vance were immediately evacuated from the ballroom by tactical teams and moved to a secure location following the incident.

Trump praises security, addresses incident

Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump heaped praise on security officers for their swift response during the shooting incident at the White House Correspondents' Dinner, while also recalling past assassination attempts on him in Pennsylvania and Florida.

Trump, while delivering remarks in the Press Briefing Room, after the shooting incident, announced that the shooter of the White House Correspondents' Dinner in Washington is a resident of California and is 'sick'.

"The law enforcement and DC police just spoke with the mayor... You see the attacker in different positions, but you also see the attacker totally subdued and under control... This is not the first time in the past couple of years that our republic has been attacked by a would-be assassin who sought to kill in Butler, Pennsylvania, less than two years ago... and in Palm Beach, Florida, a few months after that, we came close. We really had, again, some great work done by law enforcement...," he said.

Calls for enhanced security with new ballroom

The US President further used the security breach at the Hilton to highlight the need for enhanced security infrastructure and to make the case for the ballroom he is constructing at the White House, suggesting that the structure would provide a more secure location for future events.

"It's not a particularly secure building, and I didn't want to say this, but this is why we have to have all of the attributes of what we're planning at the White House," Trump said during his news conference. "It's actually a larger room, and it's much more secure. It's got drone-proof. It's bulletproof glass. We need the ballroom. That's why Secret Service, that's why the military is demanding it," he added.

(ANI)

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by Asianet Newsable English staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Global Military Spending Explodes to $2.9 Trillion Amid Wars: What Is the World Preparing For?

Asianet Newsable English — Mon, 27 Apr 2026 11:01:11 +0530

Global military spending reached nearly $2.9 trillion in 2025, marking an 11th consecutive year of growth, researchers said Monday, as insecurity and rearmament fuelled defence budgets.

The three top spenders -- the United States, China and Russia -- spent a combined total of $1.48 trillion, just over half of global expenditure.

Spending rose by 2.9 percent compared with 2024, despite a reduction by the US, the world's biggest spender, according to a report by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).

Researcher Lorenzo Scarazzato told AFP the decrease from the US was more than offset by increases in Europe and Asia, as the world marked "another year of wars and increased tensions".

Scarazzato said this was also reflected in the global "military burden" -- the share of worldwide GDP devoted to military spending -- which reached its highest level since 2009.

"Everything points to a world that feels less secure and is spending on its military to compensate for the global landscape," he said.

The US spent $954 billion, 7.5 percent less than in 2024, largely because no new financial military aid to Ukraine was approved. By contrast, Washinhton pledged a total of $127 billion to Kyiv over the previous three years.

But the decrease is expected to be short-lived as the US Congress has approved spending of over $1 trillion for 2026, which could rise to $1.5 trillion in 2027 if US President Donald Trump's budget proposal passes.

The main driver of the global increase was Europe -- including Russia and Ukraine -- where spending surged 14 percent to $864 billion.

"That is driven by two major factors. One is the ongoing war in Ukraine, and the other is the decreased US engagement with Europe," Scarazzato said.

He explained that the US is "pushing for Europe to take more care of its own defence".

Germany, the fourth-largest spender, raised expenditure by 24 percent in 2025 to $114 billion.

Spain also recorded a 50 percent jump to $40.2 billion, pushing military spending above two percent of GDP for the first time since 1994.

Middle East tensions

The ongoing war in Ukraine saw both Russia and Ukraine increase their military spending, with each recording the highest share of government spending allocated to the military.

Russia's spending rose 5.9 percent to $190 billion, equivalent to 7.5 percent of GDP.

Ukraine meanwhile boosted spending by 20 percent to $84.1 billion -- a staggering 40 percent of GDP.

Despite persistent tensions in the Middle East, expenditure in the region rose only marginally, by 0.1 percent, to $218 billion.

While most countries in the region increased spending, Israel and Iran actually recorded declines.

In Iran, it fell 5.6 percent to $7.4 billion, but this was mostly due to high annual inflation of 42 percent. In nominal terms, spending actually rose.

Israel's 4.9 percent drop to $48.3 billion reflected a reduced intensity in the Gaza war after a January 2025 ceasefire deal, the researchers explained, while noting Israeli spending was still 97 percent higher than in 2022.

In Asia and Oceania, spending reached $681 billion, an 8.5 percent increase from 2024 -- the region's largest annual increase since 2009.

Scarazzato said the "major player" in the region was China, which has been increasing spending every year for the past three decades, and spent an estimated $336 billion in 2025.

"But perhaps what's interesting is the reaction of some other states, such as South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan, reacting to the threat perception," he said.

Japan raised military expenditure by 9.7 percent, to $62.2 billion in 2025, equivalent to 1.4 percent of GDP -- its highest share since 1958 -- while Taiwan increased its spending by 14 percent to $18.2 billion.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by Asianet Newsable English staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

King Charles III, Donald Trump Toast Ties Amid Nuclear Tensions With Iran

Asianet Newsable English — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:15:41 +0530

Britain's King Charles and Donald Trump hailed their countries' longstanding ties at a White House state dinner Tuesday -- despite the US president claiming the monarch agreed with him on Iran's nuclear weapons.

Over a lavish meal, Charles echoed the tone of his earlier speech to Congress in which he urged London and Washington to stick together, without directly mentioning the tensions over the US-Israeli war with Tehran.

But in his toast to a gala dinner attended by tech titans and golfer Rory McIlroy, Trump made his first public comments on the sensitive topic during the four-day visit by the British royals.

"We have militarily defeated that particular opponent," Trump said at the White House dinner. "Charles agrees with me even more than I do -- we're never going to let that opponent have a nuclear weapon."

Trump has repeatedly lambasted British Prime Minister Keir Starmer over his opposition to the Iran war, and there is no indication that King Charles has shown support for the US leader's stance.

Nevertheless, both leaders strongly praised the "special relationship" between Britain and Washington, putting aside however briefly the transatlantic tensions.

In his toast, Charles said he was "here to renew an indispensable alliance which has long been a cornerstone of prosperity and security."

Yet Charles pointedly mentioned the importance of international alliances like NATO that Trump has repeatedly disparaged -- and called for continued support for Ukraine as it battles Russia's invasion.

"Together, we can meet the challenges of an increasingly complex and contested world," he added.

Star guests

The menu for the lavish dinner included a garden vegetable veloute, spring herbed ravioli and Dover sole meuniere, followed by a White House honey and vanilla bean cremeux.

Invited guests included Apple boss Tim Cook, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Nvidia's Jensen Huang, and two-time Masters-winning golfer Rory McIlroy, who was born in Northern Ireland.

The king and the president also struck a light-hearted tone, with Charles joking about Trump's recent comments that allies would be speaking German if not for US support in World War II.

"Dare I say that, if it wasn't for us, you'd be speaking French," Charles quipped, referring to the contest between the colonial powers of Britain and France before US independence 250 years ago.

Trump meanwhile hailed Charles's "fantastic" speech to Congress, adding: "He got the Democrats to stand -- I've never been able to do that."

The king received a warm reception from lawmakers in Congress as he urged the United States on Tuesday to stand firm with its Western allies, and broached topics like the environment that Trump often scorns.

Charles stressed that "unyielding resolve" was needed to secure a "just and lasting peace" in Ukraine, which has been fighting a full-scale invasion by Russia since 2022.

‘No closer friends’

In just the second speech to Congress by a British monarch following his mother Elizabeth II in 1991, Charles also pointed to shared democratic traditions that opponents have accused Trump of undermining.

He noted that the British Magna Carta had been cited in more than 160 US Supreme Court cases, highlighting -- to rapt applause from the opposition Democrats -- the principle that executive power is subject to checks and balances.

Trump earlier hailed Britain as America's closest ally as he welcomed Charles and Queen Camilla to the White House with pomp, ceremony, a 21-gun salute and a flypast.

"In the centuries since we won our independence, Americans have had no closer friends than the British," Trump said.

The visit comes at a delicate moment, with Trump criticizing Britain over its stance on Iran and other policies.

Despite the tensions, the US president struck a jovial tone, joking about his Scottish-born mother having "a crush on Charles" and making a jibe about the British weather.

Security has been tight during the visit following an alleged assassination attempt against Trump at a weekend Washington media gala.

"Such acts of violence will never succeed," Charles said.

The royals will visit New York on Wednesday, touring the 9/11 memorial, before departing Thursday for Bermuda.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by Asianet Newsable English staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Could Iran Be Forced To Shut Oil Wells As Storage Tanks Fill Up?

Divya Danu — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:02:38 +0530

Iran's oil industry is facing one of its biggest challenges in years. A US naval blockade near the Strait of Hormuz has sharply reduced Iran's ability to export crude oil. As a result, millions of barrels are piling up inside the country. Storage tanks are filling fast. Oil tankers are being used as floating storage. Even old ships are being brought back into service.

️ Iran Has 22 Days of Oil Storage Left, Kpler SaysIran is rapidly running out of places to store crude oil, with only 12 to 22 days of unused storage capacity remaining, according to shipping data firm Kpler, reported by Bloomberg. ▪️Iranian crude exports have reportedly… pic.twitter.com/6fYmxmtR17

— Drop Site (@DropSiteNews) April 28, 2026

Experts now warn that Iran could soon run out of room to store its oil. If that happens, Tehran may have no choice but to cut production even more, or even shut some oil wells entirely.

Why Iran is facing this crisis

The problem began after the United States tightened pressure on Iran earlier this month. On April 13, Washington imposed a naval blockade targeting Iranian ports and oil tankers operating near the Strait of Hormuz.

This waterway is one of the world's most important shipping routes. A large share of global oil passes through it every day.

Before the blockade, Iran was exporting oil without major disruption. But tanker traffic has now slowed dramatically.

That has created a serious bottleneck.

Exports have collapsed

The numbers show just how severe the situation has become. According to shipping data firm Kpler, Iran exported about 1.85 million barrels per day in March.

Between April 14 and April 23, that figure dropped to just 567,000 barrels per day. That is a fall of almost 70 percent.

Even more striking, Kpler says it has not seen any Iranian tanker successfully bypass the blockade.

Only a handful of cargoes have left Iranian ports since the restrictions were imposed.

Storage space is disappearing fast

Iran is still pumping oil from its fields, even though exports have fallen sharply. That oil has to go somewhere.

Much of it is now being stored on land or loaded onto tankers waiting offshore. Kpler estimates Iran has only 12 to 22 days of usable storage capacity left.

Its onshore crude stockpiles have already risen by about 4.6 million barrels. They now stand at nearly 49 million barrels.

Total capacity is estimated at around 86 million barrels, though not all of that can be used safely or easily.

Why full storage is dangerous

Oil producers cannot simply keep pumping forever. Once storage tanks are full, production must slow down. Operators usually cut output before reaching maximum capacity. They need spare room for safety and smooth operations.

If Iran waits too long, it could face serious technical problems.

In the worst case, some oil wells may need to be shut. Restarting them later can be costly and complicated. Sometimes, production never fully returns to previous levels.

Production is already falling

Goldman Sachs estimates Iran has already cut output by as much as 2.5 million barrels per day. If the blockade continues, Kpler believes production could fall even further.

By mid-May, Iran's crude output could drop to around 1.2 to 1.3 million barrels per day. That would be more than half below normal levels.

Such a decline would be a major blow to Tehran.

Iran revives old tanker

To buy time, Iran has turned to unusual measures. It has reportedly reactivated the Nasha, a 30-year-old oil tanker. The ship is being used as extra floating storage. This shows just how serious the situation has become.

When countries start dusting off ageing tankers, it usually means available storage is running dangerously low.

Can Iran send oil by rail?

Iran is also trying another option. According to The Wall Street Journal, Tehran is exploring rail exports to China. Rail links connect Iran to Chinese cities such as Yiwu and Xi'an.

But moving oil by train is expensive and slow. The journey can take weeks.

For China's smaller independent refineries, known as teapots, tanker shipments are far cheaper. That makes rail a temporary fix at best.

Financial pain will come later

Interestingly, Iran may not feel the financial hit immediately. Iranian crude usually takes about two months to reach China. Payment often takes another two months after delivery.

That means the full impact on government revenues may not become clear for three to four months. For now, the storage problem is the more urgent threat.

US issues fresh warning

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Iran's oil industry is already beginning to shut down. He wrote on social media that the surviving leaders of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps were "trapped".

He also warned that Iran could soon face petrol shortages.

His comments underline Washington's confidence that the blockade is working.

Peace talks remain uncertain

At the same time, diplomatic efforts are continuing. Iran has reportedly proposed a plan that would reopen shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.

In return, it wants the United States to lift its blockade. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the proposal was better than expected.

However, he insisted any final agreement must stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Iran rejected what it called America's "illegal and irrational demands".

That means a breakthrough is far from certain.

Oil prices are climbing

Markets are reacting quickly. Brent crude rose above $113 a barrel on Wednesday. US West Texas Intermediate climbed above $101.

Both are well above levels seen before the latest escalation.

Traders fear that a prolonged blockade could remove even more oil from global markets. That would push prices higher still. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the most important oil routes on Earth.

It connects the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea.

Around one-fifth of the world's oil supply normally passes through it. Any disruption there immediately affects global energy prices.

That is exactly what is happening now.

Wider impact on the region

The conflict is affecting more than just Iran. Regional producers including Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates have also reduced output since fighting began.

This has tightened global supply further.

The UAE's recent decision to leave OPEC and OPEC+ added another twist, though markets reacted calmly.

What analysts are saying

Stephen Innes of SPI Asset Management summed up the situation clearly. Iran wants the blockade removed. The United States controls that decision.

Meanwhile, every extra day adds pressure. Storage fills up. Production risks rise.

And oil markets become more nervous.

If the blockade continues, Iran faces a difficult choice. It can either keep storing oil until capacity runs out, or cut production more aggressively now.

Neither option is attractive.

A diplomatic breakthrough would ease the crisis quickly. But talks remain fragile.

For now, the clock is ticking.

A high-stakes energy battle

Iran's oil industry is approaching a critical point. Exports have collapsed. Storage is nearly full.

Production is already falling.

The longer the blockade lasts, the greater the damage could be.

For Iran, this is not just an economic problem. It is a strategic challenge.

For the rest of the world, it is another reminder of how quickly tensions in the Middle East can shake global markets.

The next few weeks could prove decisive.

(With AFP inputs)

Trump Invokes Lincoln to Explain Repeated Assassination Threats After Shooting Scare (WATCH)

Asianet Newsable English — Sun, 26 Apr 2026 11:03:11 +0530

US President Donald Trump struck a philosophical tone Saturday after a shooter rushed a media gala in Washington, the latest in a series of incidents to target the Republican leader.

"I ask respectfully, why do you think this keeps happening to you?" a reporter asked Trump after the chaotic incident at the White House Correspondents' Dinner.

‘Most Impactful People Are Targeted,’ Says Trump

Trump had a ready answer, and it was about the 79-year-old's own position in the pantheon of US presidents.

"Well, you know, I've studied assassinations," Trump said. "And I must tell you the most impactful people, the people that do the most -- you take a look at Abraham Lincoln... the people that make the biggest impact, they're the ones that they go after."

"I hate to say I'm honored by that, but I've done a lot," Trump added. "We've changed this country, and there are a lot of people that are not happy about that. So I think that's the answer."

Trump:I’ve studied assassinations, the most impactful people, the people who do the most; they’re the ones they go after. Like Abraham Lincoln….I hate to say I’m honored by that but I’ve done a lot pic.twitter.com/AtpkB1LilI

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) April 26, 2026

Trump, who survived an assassination attempt at an election rally in 2024, added that "I lead a pretty normal life, considering, you know, it's a dangerous life."

"A lot of other people, you know, you read stories where they become basket cases. To be honest, I'm not a basket case."

Trump meanwhile took a measured tone towards the press -- despite previously calling it the "enemy of the people" -- saying there was "a tremendous amount of love and coming together" after the incident.

He said he had been ready to give the "most inappropriate speech ever made" but would now be "very boring" when the dinner was rescheduled.

Security Concerns Raised After Gala Incident

The shooting on Saturday, which Trump blamed on a "would-be assassin," also caused him to riff on one of his favorite topics -- the huge $400 million ballroom he is building at the White House.

Trump said the venue for the correspondents' dinner, the Washington Hilton, was "not particularly secure" and showed the need for the construction of the new ballroom.

(Except for the headline, this AFP story has not been edited by Asianet Newsable English staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Trump Gala Shooting: Global Leaders Express Shock, Condemn Violence in Democracy

Asianet Newsable English — Sun, 26 Apr 2026 14:46:49 +0530

World leaders expressed shock after a shooter charged a glitzy media gala in Washington on Saturday night attended by US President Donald Trump -- and relief that there were no casualties.

US law enforcement said the sole suspect, armed with "a shotgun, a handgun and multiple knives," has been detained and will face charges Monday in federal court.

Here is how leaders reacted:

Keir Starmer

Britain's prime minister said he was "shocked by the scenes at the White House Correspondents' Dinner in Washington overnight."

"Any attack on democratic institutions or on the freedom of the press must be condemned in the strongest possible terms," Starmer wrote on X on Sunday.

I am shocked by the scenes at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner in Washington overnight.Any attack on democratic institutions or on the freedom of the press must be condemned in the strongest possible terms.It is a huge relief that @POTUS, the First Lady and all those…

— Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) April 26, 2026

Benjamin Netanyahu

The Israeli prime minister said he and his wife Sara "were shocked by the attempted assassination" of Trump.

"We are relieved that the President and the First Lady are safe and strong," Netanyahu wrote on X.

"We send our wishes for a full and speedy recovery to the wounded police officer and salute the US Secret Service for their swift and decisive action."

Sara and I were shocked by the attempted assassination of President @realDonaldTrump last night in Washington, DC. We are relieved that the President and the First Lady are safe and strong. We send our wishes for a full and speedy recovery to the wounded police officer and salute…

— Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו (@netanyahu) April 26, 2026

Narendra Modi

The prime minister of India said he was "relieved to learn that President Trump, the First Lady and Vice President are safe and unharmed."

"I extend my best wishes for their continued safety and well-being. Violence has no place in a democracy and must be unequivocally condemned," Modi wrote on X.

— Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) April 26, 2026

Mark Carney

The Canadian prime minister said he was "relieved that the President, the First Lady, and all guests are safe."

"Political violence has no place in any democracy and my thoughts are with all those who have been shaken by this disturbing event," Carney wrote on X.

I am relieved that the President, the First Lady, and all guests are safe following reports of gunfire at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner in Washington tonight.Political violence has no place in any democracy and my thoughts are with all those who have been shaken by…

— Mark Carney (@MarkJCarney) April 26, 2026

Claudia Sheinbaum

The Mexican president wrote on X that "it is good that President Trump and his wife are safe following the recent events. We send them our respect."

"Violence must never be the way," Sheinbaum added.

Qué bueno que el presidente Trump y su esposa se encuentren bien, tras los recientes acontecimientos. Le enviamos nuestro respeto. La violencia no debe ser nunca el camino.

— Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo (@Claudiashein) April 26, 2026

Pedro Sanchez

Spain's prime minister condemned what he called "the attack that took place tonight against President (Trump)."

"Violence is never the answer. Humanity will only move forward through democracy, coexistence, and peace," Sanchez wrote on X.

Shehbaz Sharif

The Pakistani prime minister wrote he was "deeply shocked by the disturbing shooting incident."

"Relieved to know that President Trump, the First Lady, and other attendees are safe. My thoughts and prayers are with him, and I wish him continued safety and well-being," Sharif wrote on X.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by Asianet Newsable English staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)